Motion-blurred skater in a Los Angeles Kings sweater
Breakdown · MIN at LAK

Kings edge the Wild in a shootout

The verdict · earned

The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

MIN 4 · LAK 5
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:10 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Kings won 5-4 in a shootout, but J. Wallstedt was the difference-maker. His 0.921 save percentage (+1.67 versus expected) kept Minnesota within reach despite Los Angeles's dominance — 58% of shot attempts, 7–5 high-danger chances, and 4.67–4.02 expected goals. Both teams scored four rush goals, but Wallstedt's elite goaltending prevented a Kings rout.

D. Kuemper stopped 24 of 28 shots (0.857 SV%). Minnesota stayed tight through clinical 40% finishing on high-danger chances (2 of 5), but neither team converted rebound opportunities. Brandt Clarke's doorstep finish won it in the shootout.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Jan 3
MIN
4
LAK
5

Kings edge the Wild in a shootout

Chances 4.0 – 4.7Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Kings earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
MIN
4.02
LAK
4.67
46% of the chances54%

The board read MIN 4, LAK 5. The chances read MIN 4.0, LAK 4.7.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
LAK
+0.3
goals above expected
LAK4.67 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
MIN4.02 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:08LAKA. Kempe0–1
  2. P1 08:28MINJ. Middleton1–1
  3. P2 16:57LAKC. PerryPP1–2
  4. P2 18:23MINJ. Eriksson EkPP2–2
  5. P3 04:54LAKQ. Byfield2–3
  6. P3 07:33MINB. Faber3–3
  7. P3 12:09LAKS. Helenius3–4
+4 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
MIN
55 shots
5
Final
120 shots
LAK
65 shots
6
MIN attackLAK attack
MIN LAK Goal

Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

55
shots · 5 in
65
shots · 6 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
MINLAK
2 / 5
1.14 xG
High danger
2 / 7
1.50 xG
1 / 20
2.30 xG
Medium
2 / 20
2.26 xG
1 / 45
0.58 xG
Low
0 / 57
0.92 xG

The Kings buried 2 of 7 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Wallstedt
+1.7
MIN · 35/38
C
D. Kuemper
+0.0
LAK · 24/28
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Kings edge the Wild in a shootout

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–11
  1. 06:08LAKA. Kempe(A. Kopitar, A. Laferriere)0–1
  2. 08:28MINJ. Middleton(M. Zuccarello, Z. Bogosian)1–1
2ndshots 8–9
  1. 16:57LAKC. Perrypower play(Q. Byfield, B. Clarke)1–2
  2. 18:23MINJ. Eriksson Ekpower play(Q. Hughes)2–2
3rdshots 12–13
  1. 04:54LAKQ. Byfield2–3
  2. 07:33MINB. Faber(D. Yurov, K. Kaprizov)3–3
  3. 12:09LAKS. Helenius(K. Fiala, A. Turcotte)3–4
  4. 17:03MINM. Boldy(B. Faber, M. Foligno)4–4
OTshots 3–6no goals
    SO
    1. 00:00LAKA. Kempepower play4–4
    2. 00:00MINM. Boldypower play4–4
    3. 00:00LAKB. Clarkepower play4–4

    score reads MIN–LAK

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    4.67
    LAK chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.3
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    0.991
    LAK puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    54.5%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.02Expected goals4.67
    LAK 54% of the chance quality
    28Shots on goal39
    5High-danger chances7
    70All attempts (Corsi)84
    Adjusted for score: MIN 46% · LAK 54%
    Faceoffs · LAK won64%off36%neu47%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    MIN2 / 5 · 1.14 xG
    LAK2 / 7 · 1.50 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    MIN1 / 20 · 2.30 xG
    LAK2 / 20 · 2.26 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    MIN1 / 45 · 0.58 xG
    LAK0 / 57 · 0.92 xG

    MIN went 1-for-20 from medium danger on 2.30 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    MIN
    4 G · 4.02 xG · -0.0
    LAK
    5 G · 4.67 xG · +0.3
    0123456

    MIN finished -0.0 against expected, LAK +0.3.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    MIN
    WRIST1/26
    SNAP2/10
    SLAP0/4
    TIP IN0/3
    BACKHAND0/5
    BAT0/2
    DEFLECTED1/1
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/19
    LAK
    WRIST2/42
    SNAP0/2
    SLAP0/7
    TIP IN0/5
    BACKHAND0/2
    BAT0/0
    DEFLECTED1/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER1/24
    MIN
    LAK
    Off the rush
    4 G on 36
    3.27 xG
    4 G on 35
    3.03 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 4
    0.50 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.43 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 1-for-26, LAK 2-for-42. MIN scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    J. Wallstedt
    MIN · 35/38 · .921
    +1.7
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/71.5-0.5
    Medium2/202.3+0.3
    Low0/570.9+0.9

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    D. Kuemper
    LAK · 24/28 · .857
    +0.0
    saved above expected
    C
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/51.1-0.9
    Medium1/202.3+1.3
    Low1/450.6-0.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    120 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    MIN
    55 shots
    5
    Final
    120 shots
    LAK
    65 shots
    6
    MIN attackLAK attack
    MIN LAK Goal

    Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

    Each club shoots toward its own end — MIN left, LAK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    B. Faber
    #7 · D · MIN
    1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:20 on ice
    Q. Byfield
    #55 · R · LAK
    1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:47 on ice
    Q. Hughes
    #43 · D · MIN
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 29:05 on ice
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sat, Jan 3
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:08 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a MIN 2.4 - 2.5 LAK game with the Kings at 53% win probability, which is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

    Minnesota arrives as the hotter team by record: 7-1-2 in their last 10 games. The Kings, by contrast, are -8 in goal differential over the same span, a deficit that reads as defensive collapse more than poor luck. Yet the season 5v5 xG% splits the difference at 52.0% for both teams, suggesting their underlying quality is equivalent.

    Where they diverge is possession and rest. Los Angeles drives Corsi at 52.0% to Minnesota's 48.0%—expect the Kings to control territory for stretches. They also carry a rest advantage, arriving on one day off while the Wild have three. That's typically considered a slight edge, though the Wild's recent hot streak suggests confidence matters here too.

    D. Kuemper plays the back-to-back for Los Angeles. Monitor whether the Kings start their backup or trust their starter despite the fatigue; that choice alone can shift close games.

    Minnesota's offensive punch runs through Matt Boldy, who sits at 22G 18A with 0.89 xG/60 and five high-danger goals on a 13.7% shooting rate. Robby Fabbri shadows him in secondary impact (0.88 xG/60), though Fabbri is marked likely out and projects to miss tonight. For Los Angeles, Alex Laferriere leads at 0.87 xG/60 with 16G 18A and two high-danger goals at 9.9% shooting. Jared Wright has no goals but four assists while generating 0.83 xG/60—a secondary scorer who's been efficient on low volume.

    The Kings' matchup priority is neutralizing Boldy, whose high-danger count and elevated shooting rate signal real goal-scoring talent. The Wild face a similar task with Laferriere, whose 16-goal pace and high-danger goals argue he's become a genuine primary threat, not just a depth scorer riding variance.

    Kuemper's fatigue, Minnesota's momentum, and Los Angeles' possession advantage cancel each other out. This is a coin flip.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    LAK 53%
    53%
    LAK
    Model favorite
    47%
    53%
    MIN50LAK

    LAK by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MIN 2.4–2.5 LAK; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    MIN← edge
    edge →LAK
    52.0%52.0%
    48.0%52.0%
    2.552.42
    2.402.20
    2.041.85
    1.931.71
    1.0071.002

    LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.007 vs 1.002) says MIN has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    MIN
    7-1-2
    +14 GD · 3d rest
    LAK
    2-6-2
    -8 GD · 1d rest
    1.007
    MIN PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.002
    LAK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Things to watch
    • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • D. Kuemper is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Wild are the hotter team by points pace (7-1-2 in their last 10).
    • The Kings are underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Wild have 2 more days of rest.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    MIN
    Expected in goal
    J. Wallstedt
    3 days rest.893 last start
    Backup Filip Gustavsson · +1.4 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    LAK
    Expected in goal
    D. Kuemper
    back-to-back.826 last start
    Backup Darcy Kuemper · -5.8 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    MIN
    Matt Boldy22G 18A
    0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
    Robby Fabbri2G 3A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
    LAK
    Alex Laferriere16G 18A
    0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
    Jared Wright0G 4A
    0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next