Motion-blurred skater in a Nashville Predators sweater
Breakdown · WSH at NSH

Predators steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.86–2.74 and won anyway.

WSH 2 · NSH 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 12:24 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Nashville won 3-2 despite generating just 42% of expected goals. Washington created 3.86 xG to Nashville's 2.74—a 58% share that normally carries games. Not this one.

The Capitals' collapse came in high-danger areas. Washington had six premium chances and converted zero; Nashville had two. J. Annunen stopped all the dangerous looks, recording a 0.938 save percentage (30 of 32 shots) with 1.86 goals saved above expected—the margin that decided this game.

Nashville's power play supplied the edge. The Predators scored twice on 14 power-play shots (1.22 xG), converting the chances Washington conceded on special teams. Washington's even-strength superiority—controlling the puck and the chances—vanished from the scoreboard.

On the rush, Washington stayed competitive (two goals on 23 chances to Nashville's three on 26). But in the moments that mattered, the Capitals had nothing. Ethen Frank's wrist shot from the high slot (09:03 of the third period) proved decisive.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 11
WSH
2
NSH
3

Predators steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

Chances 3.9 – 2.7Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
3.86
NSH
2.74
59% of the chances42%

The board read WSH 2, NSH 3. The chances read WSH 3.9, NSH 2.7.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NSH
+0.3
goals above expected
NSH2.74 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH3.86 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:56WSHA. OvechkinPP1–0
  2. P1 13:15NSHS. StamkosPP1–1
  3. P3 01:12NSHC. Smith1–2
  4. P3 03:29NSHR. JosiPP1–3
  5. P3 09:03WSHE. FrankPP2–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
50 shots
2
Final
87 shots
NSH
37 shots
3
WSH attackNSH attack
WSH NSH Goal
50
shots · 2 in
37
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHNSH
0 / 6
1.34 xG
High danger
0 / 2
0.46 xG
2 / 16
1.92 xG
Medium
3 / 15
1.63 xG
0 / 40
0.59 xG
Low
0 / 25
0.64 xG

The Capitals went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Annunen
+1.9
NSH · 30/32
D
C. Lindgren
−0.3
WSH · 18/21
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Predators steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 11–8
  1. 05:56WSHA. Ovechkinpower play(J. Carlson, R. Leonard)1–0
  2. 13:15NSHS. Stamkospower play(F. Forsberg, R. Josi)1–1
2ndshots 9–6no goals
    3rdshots 12–7
    1. 01:12NSHC. Smith(R. Josi, R. Schaefer)1–2
    2. 03:29NSHR. Josipower play(S. Stamkos, R. O'Reilly)1–3
    3. 09:03WSHE. Frankpower play(A. Ovechkin, D. Strome)2–3

    score reads WSH–NSH

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.74
    NSH chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.3
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.039
    NSH puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    40.4%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.86Expected goals2.74
    WSH 59% of the chance quality
    32Shots on goal21
    6High-danger chances2
    62All attempts (Corsi)42
    Adjusted for score: WSH 61% · NSH 39%
    Faceoffs · NSH won38%off47%neu53%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    WSH0 / 6 · 1.34 xG
    NSH0 / 2 · 0.46 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    WSH2 / 16 · 1.92 xG
    NSH3 / 15 · 1.63 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    WSH0 / 40 · 0.59 xG
    NSH0 / 25 · 0.64 xG

    NSH went 3-for-15 from medium danger on 1.63 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    WSH
    2 G · 3.86 xG · -1.9
    NSH
    3 G · 2.74 xG · +0.3
    012345

    WSH finished -1.9 against expected, NSH +0.3.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    WSH
    WRIST1/29
    SNAP0/7
    SLAP1/6
    DEFLECTED0/2
    TIP IN0/1
    BACKHAND0/4
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    POKE0/0
    OTHER0/12
    NSH
    WRIST1/20
    SNAP0/5
    SLAP2/4
    DEFLECTED0/3
    TIP IN0/4
    BACKHAND0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    POKE0/1
    OTHER0/5
    WSH
    NSH
    Off the rush
    2 G on 23
    2.27 xG
    3 G on 26
    2.08 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 4
    0.67 xG
    0 G on 1
    0.04 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-29, NSH 1-for-20. NSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    C. Lindgren
    WSH · 18/21 · .857
    -0.3
    saved above expected
    D
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/20.5+0.5
    Medium3/151.6-1.4
    Low0/250.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Annunen
    NSH · 30/32 · .938
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.3+1.3
    Medium2/161.9-0.1
    Low0/400.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    87 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    WSH
    50 shots
    2
    Final
    87 shots
    NSH
    37 shots
    3
    WSH attackNSH attack
    WSH NSH Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, NSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    R. Josi
    #59 · D · NSH
    1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:53 on ice · +1
    S. Stamkos
    #91 · C · NSH
    1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:52 on ice
    A. Ovechkin
    #8 · L · WSH
    1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:26 on ice
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sun, Jan 11
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 12:22 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    This is about as close to a coin flip as advanced models can project. The forecasts land on Washington 2.6–2.7 goals with Nashville holding 51% win probability—the narrowest of edges, if one exists at all.

    The underlying talent gap is nearly invisible. Washington edges the expected-goals share at 50.0% to Nashville's 49.0%, but the Predators flip the script on shot generation, logging a 50.0% Corsi advantage to the Capitals' 49.0%. One team dominates play quality; the other takes more shots. Both claims are defensible.

    The wildcard is luck. Washington's PDO of 1.018 screams positive variance—goals are flowing at an unsustainable rate. Nashville sits at 0.992, suggesting regression upward. If the Capitals' shooting luck dries even slightly, this game tightens further.

    Goaltending adds another layer of uncertainty. L. Thompson handles Nashville's workload on a back-to-back, which typically signals either a relief appearance or a starter running on fumes. Either scenario tilts toward more goals.

    For Washington, Alex Ovechkin anchors the offense with a 0.97 xG/60 and 19 goals already—at 13.8% shooting, he's nearly at his historical efficiency. Anthony Beauvillier complements him at 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals, hitting 10.4% on his attempts. Both excel in high-danger areas, with 2 high-danger goals each. Nashville's defense must collapse on them, or these two will find space.

    Nashville counters with Filip Forsberg, whose 23 goals and 0.80 xG/60 establish him as the group's most dangerous scorer, shooting at 13.6% with 4 high-danger goals. Zachary L'Heureux presents a different profile: 4 goals on 0.85 xG/60 despite shooting at 16.0%, with only 1 high-danger goal.

    The defensive liabilities are known. Washington leans on Declan Chisholm in defensive situations, a weak point. Nashville's Jonathan Marchessault carries similar liability. Both teams will test these matchups aggressively.

    This genuinely is a toss-up. The models project it that way for good reason: neither team holds a meaningful edge on talent, and the variance factors—Washington's hot PDO, Nashville's cold one, and Thompson's workload—don't settle the question. That's what makes this game a true coin flip.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NSH 51%
    51%
    NSH
    Model favorite
    49%
    51%
    WSH50NSH

    NSH by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.7 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    WSH← edge
    edge →NSH
    50.0%49.0%
    49.0%50.0%
    2.622.48
    2.622.58
    2.181.84
    1.792.21
    1.0180.992

    WSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.992) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    WSH
    4-4-2
    -1 GD · 1d rest
    NSH
    7-3-0
    +1 GD · 2d rest
    1.018
    WSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.992
    NSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Regression watch
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • L. Thompson is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    WSH
    Expected in goal
    L. Thompson
    back-to-back.958 last start
    Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NSH
    Expected in goal
    J. Saros
    2 days rest.968 last start
    Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    WSH
    Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
    0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
    Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
    0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
    NSH
    Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
    0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
    Filip Forsberg23G 17A
    0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next