Backcheck
Recap · SJS at WSH

Sharks hold off the Capitals

The Sharks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 12:55 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
SJS
San Jose Sharks
3
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.79Expected goals2.48
53% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)23
3High-danger chances2
53Corsi (all attempts)50
Score-adjusted: 49% / 51%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

San Jose's 3-2 win masked the Capitals' possession edge—they held 47% of shot attempts and matched nearly even expected goals (2.48–2.79 split), yet the Sharks' efficiency trumped control.

The Capitals generated four rebound opportunities by crashing the net effectively, but converted just one. The Sharks, meanwhile, were ruthless on the rush: three goals on 21 rush chances demonstrated a transition sharpness the Capitals couldn't match.

High-danger chances (3–2, Sharks) tilted the same way. L. Thompson, the Capitals' goalie, faced 26 shots and allowed three goals, posting a 0.885 save percentage that reflected difficult looks he couldn't deny. A. Nedeljkovic answered with 21 saves on 23 attempts (0.913 SV%), recording critical stops down the stretch that sealed the outcome.

Ryan Leonard's snap shot from the high slot at 9:11 of the third period epitomized the Capitals' night: they generated chances but couldn't finish enough. C. Graf (1G, 1A in 20:06) and P. Regenda (1G, 1A in 13:46) led San Jose's counterattack, with J. Chychrun notching an assist (28:19) for the Capitals.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SJS2 / 3 · 0.74 xG
WSH0 / 2 · 0.40 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SJS1 / 14 · 1.48 xG
WSH2 / 16 · 1.68 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SJS0 / 36 · 0.57 xG
WSH0 / 32 · 0.41 xG

SJS went 2-for-3 from high danger on 0.74 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SJS
3 G · 2.79 xG · +0.2
WSH
2 G · 2.48 xG · -0.5
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. NedeljkovicSJS
+0.5
L. ThompsonWSH
-0.2

SJS finished +0.2 against expected, WSH -0.5 — A. Nedeljkovic (SJS) saved 0.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SJS
SNAP2/22
SLAP0/10
TIP IN1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BACKHAND0/1
WRIST0/0
OTHER0/15
WSH
SNAP1/24
SLAP0/7
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
BACKHAND1/2
WRIST0/1
OTHER0/12
SJS
WSH
Off the rush
3 G on 21 · 1.87 xG
1 G on 19 · 1.43 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.16 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.40 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: SJS went 2-for-22, WSH 1-for-24. SJS scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Graf
#51 · R · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 20:06 TOI · +2
P. Regenda
#84 · L · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 13:46 TOI · +2
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 28:19 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • WSH created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · SJS at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Sharks at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 12:52 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
WSH
Model favorite
46%
54%
SJS50WSH

WSH by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SJS 2.52.7 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

SJS← edge
edge →WSH
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
47.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.33xGF / 602.62
2.56xGA / 602.62
1.99Goals for / gm2.18
2.32Goals against / gm1.79
0.998PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.998 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model makes this a pick'em. An expected-goal projection has Washington winning 2.5–2.7 goals per game with a 54% win probability—the closest the market gets to flipping a coin.

San Jose is underwater over its last ten games, at -6 goal differential. Over the season at 5v5, the Sharks' 48.0% expected-goal share and 47.0% Corsi share trail a Washington team posting 50.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi. Washington's 1.018 PDO suggests fortune has been favorable; regression is coming. San Jose's 0.998 PDO shows the opposite tilt.

The Capitals hold a rest edge: one day between games versus San Jose's three. L. Thompson arrives on a back-to-back; expect either fatigue or a possible backup starter.

Washington's attack centers on Alex Ovechkin, generating 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 17 assists. His 13.8% shooting rate and two high-danger goals suggest genuine opportunity creation. Anthony Beauvillier offers complementary firepower at 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals, 9 assists, 10.4% shooting, and two high-danger goals.

San Jose counters with Igor Chernyshov, who posts 0.91 xG/60 and carries 6 goals with 8 assists. His 15.0% shooting rate indicates efficiency. Pavol Regenda was positioned as a second catalyst at 1.10 xG/60 with 5 goals, 1 assist, and 16.1% shooting—but he's marked as likely unavailable.

San Jose and Washington both register 0% on high-danger and rebound goals; neither has scored from those situations this season. Defensively, Declan Chisholm represents a liability for Washington; Igor Chernyshov fills that role for the Sharks.

The analytics suggest parity. Rest and potential goaltending questions tilt the scale marginally toward Washington, but only barely. A coin flip remains the honest projection.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters