Mammoth run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Mammoth earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Seattle generated 4.06 expected goals but scored only 3—underperforming by 1.06 despite quality chances. Utah's 6-3 win reflected what the underlying metrics showed: complete Mammoth dominance.
The Mammoth controlled 60% of shot attempts (31–21) and 60% of expected goals (6.20–4.06), with high-danger chances 10–6 in their favor. Utah's rush attack was lethal: 3 goals on 21 chances. They also crashed the net harder—6 rebound opportunities with 1 converted, versus Seattle's 4 and 1.
N. Schmidt led the way: 2 goals and 2 assists in 20:39. L. Crouse added 1 goal and 2 assists in 18:42, and C. Keller contributed 2 assists in 18:08. Barrett Hayton's snap shot from the slot in the third period (19:09) was the turning point.
Grubauer (0.833 SV%, +1.20 expected) was solid in defeat. Vejmelka (0.857 SV%, +1.06 expected) matched him. Utah simply controlled the game from end to end.
The danger ladder
UTA went 3-for-10 from high danger on 3.96 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
SEA finished -1.1 against expected, UTA -0.2 — P. Grubauer (SEA) saved 1.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: SEA went 0-for-17, UTA 5-for-24. UTA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- P. Grubauer (SEA) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (UTA 10, SEA 6).
- UTA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
- UTA created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- SEA created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.