Motion-blurred skater in a Winnipeg Jets sweater
Breakdown · STL at WPG

Jets hold off the Blues

The verdict · stolen

The Jets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.43–2.55 and won anyway.

STL 1 · WPG 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 1:52 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Winnipeg stole this one. The Jets beat St. Louis 3–1 despite ceding 57% of expected goals at 5v5, a margin that should have punished them — instead, E. Comrie's 0.957 save percentage flipped the script.

The Blues generated 3.43 xG to the Jets' 2.55, a gap that translates to roughly one goal's worth of missed opportunity. But St. Louis couldn't finish. They went 0-for-5 on high-danger chances and left five rebound chances unconverted. That wastefulness cost them the game.

Winnipeg's response was ruthless: 2-for-4 on high-danger chances (50%), clinical execution where it mattered most. The Jets also dominated special teams, scoring twice on seven power-play opportunities — both goals from higher-quality looks than the regular 5v5 play suggested they should have.

The turning point came in the third when Mark Scheifele fired a wrist shot from the wing, a moment that reflected the larger dynamic: the Blues had the territory and the chances, but Winnipeg had the killer instinct when it counted.

E. Comrie deserves the lion's share of credit. He stopped 2.4 goals above expected, including a flawless 5-for-5 performance against high-danger attempts. It was the kind of goaltending that swallows a team's process advantage and hands you a win you had no business taking.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 20
STL
1
WPG
3

Jets hold off the Blues

Chances 3.4 – 2.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blues deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
STL
3.43
WPG
2.55
57% of the chances43%

The board read STL 1, WPG 3. The chances read STL 3.4, WPG 2.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WPG
+0.5
goals above expected
WPG2.55 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
STL3.43 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Blues left 2.4 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 09:52WPGJ. MorrisseyPP0–1
  2. P1 11:25WPGM. ScheifelePP0–2
  3. P2 17:23STLJ. KyrouPP1–2
  4. P3 17:37WPGM. ScheifeleEN1–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
STL
45 shots
1
Final
79 shots
WPG
34 shots
3
STL attackWPG attack
STL WPG Goal
45
shots · 1 in
34
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
STLWPG
0 / 5
1.16 xG
High danger
2 / 4
1.17 xG
0 / 16
1.55 xG
Medium
1 / 10
0.78 xG
1 / 48
0.72 xG
Low
0 / 34
0.59 xG

The Blues went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
E. Comrie
+2.4
WPG · 22/23
B
J. Hofer
+0.6
STL · 13/15
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Jets hold off the Blues

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–6
  1. 09:52WPGJ. Morrisseypower play(M. Scheifele, K. Connor)0–1
  2. 11:25WPGM. Scheifelepower play(J. Morrissey)0–2
2ndshots 11–8
  1. 17:23STLJ. Kyroupower play(J. Faulk, D. Dvorsky)1–2
3rdshots 6–2
  1. 17:37WPGM. Scheifeleempty net(K. Connor, J. Morrissey)1–3

score reads STL–WPG

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.55
WPG chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.5
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.048
WPG puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
41.0%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.43Expected goals2.55
STL 57% of the chance quality
23Shots on goal16
5High-danger chances4
69All attempts (Corsi)48
Adjusted for score: STL 64% · WPG 36%
Faceoffs · WPG won45%off40%neu56%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL0 / 5 · 1.16 xG
WPG2 / 4 · 1.17 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL0 / 16 · 1.55 xG
WPG1 / 10 · 0.78 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL1 / 48 · 0.72 xG
WPG0 / 34 · 0.59 xG

STL went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.55 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
1 G · 3.43 xG · -2.4
WPG
3 G · 2.55 xG · +0.5
01234

STL finished -2.4 against expected, WPG +0.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
WRIST0/25
SLAP1/9
SNAP0/8
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/24
WPG
WRIST1/14
SLAP1/8
SNAP1/9
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/14
STL
WPG
Off the rush
1 G on 24
2.45 xG
0 G on 19
1.53 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5
0.44 xG
0 G on 0
0.00 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 0-for-25, WPG 1-for-14.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Hofer
STL · 13/15 · .867
+0.6
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/41.2-0.8
Medium1/100.8-0.2
Low0/340.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

E. Comrie
WPG · 22/23 · .957
+2.4
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.2+1.2
Medium0/161.6+1.6
Low1/480.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

79 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
STL
45 shots
1
Final
79 shots
WPG
34 shots
3
STL attackWPG attack
STL WPG Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — STL left, WPG right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Morrissey
#44 · D · WPG
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:33 on ice · +1
M. Scheifele
#55 · C · WPG
2 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:58 on ice · +1
K. Connor
#81 · L · WPG
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:05 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Jan 20
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 1:51 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a STL 2.5 - 2.5 WPG game with the Jets at 51% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

St. Louis arrives in worse recent form. The Blues are underwater at -13 goal differential over their last 10, and their underlying numbers offer no relief. At even strength, St. Louis sits at 49.0% xG% and 48.0% Corsi% against Winnipeg's 48.0% xG% and 49.0% Corsi%. Both teams' PDO readings—1.000 for the Blues and 0.998 for the Jets—suggest neither team is running far ahead of what their underlying play warrants.

J. Binnington faces a back-to-back assignment. St. Louis may turn to a backup or deploy Binnington fatigued.

Players to Watch

STL

  • Jimmy Snuggerud: 0.86 xG/60, 15G 22A, 2 HD goals, 11.9% shooting
  • Dylan Holloway: 0.82 xG/60, 13G 24A, 1 HD goal, 10.8% shooting

WPG

  • Nino Niederreiter: 0.87 xG/60, 6G 6A, 3 HD goals, 8.6% shooting
  • Kyle Connor: 0.83 xG/60, 25G 30A, 2 HD goals, 13.0% shooting

St. Louis generates 0% HD goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate, identifying Jimmy Snuggerud as a defensive weak link. Winnipeg mirrors the 0% HD goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate with Colin Miller as its vulnerability.

At 51% for Winnipeg, this remains a coin flip. Neither team has separated far enough to reveal a clear edge—just two rosters where marginal execution determines the outcome.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

WPG 51%
51%
WPG
Model favorite
49%
51%
STL50WPG

WPG by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score STL 2.5–2.5 WPG; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
STL← edge
edge →WPG
49.0%48.0%
48.0%49.0%
2.342.34
2.402.55
2.001.90
2.122.10
1.0000.998

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.000 vs 0.998) says STL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
STL
4-6-0
-13 GD · 1d rest
WPG
4-4-2
+3 GD · 2d rest
1.000
STL PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.998
WPG PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Things to watch
  • J. Binnington is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Blues are underwater at -13 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
STL
Expected in goal
J. Binnington
back-to-back.821 last start
Backup Joel Hofer · +11.7 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

WPG
Expected in goal
C. Hellebuyck
2 days rest.892 last start
Backup Connor Hellebuyck · +5.5 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
Keep going

Where to next