Backcheck
Recap · NJD at EDM

J. Allen stands tall as the Devils edge the Oilers

The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.20–3.52 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:59 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
2
Home
EDM
Edmonton Oilers
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.20Expected goals3.52
52% share for the better side
17Shot attempts (SOG)23
3High-danger chances5
46Corsi (all attempts)55
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Oilers generated more quality — shot attempts at 57%, expected goals at 3.52 to 3.20, high-danger chances at 5-3 — and still lost 2-1. J. Allen's goaltending erased that advantage.

Allen stopped 22 of 23 shots for a 0.957 save percentage, saving 2.52 goals above expected. On high-danger chances, he was perfect: 5 for 5. Edmonton couldn't convert any of those opportunities — a variance that won't repeat often.

T. Jarry faced fewer shots (17 total) but also performed well, saving 1.20 goals above expected on a 0.882 save percentage. The issue wasn't his performance. Edmonton's problem was finishing. They created four rebound opportunities and converted none — crashing the net without result.

Cody Glass's snap shot from the high slot in the second period (08:32) broke the game open. New Jersey scored two goals on 3.20 expected goals; Edmonton scored one on 3.52. The Devils underperformed by 1.20; the Oilers underperformed by 2.52. Allen made that gap.

C. Glass and A. Gritsyuk each finished 1-1 (goal and assist). D. Hamilton added an assist. Process wins over time. Tonight, one outlier save rate decided it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD0 / 3 · 1.09 xG
EDM0 / 5 · 1.23 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD2 / 16 · 1.68 xG
EDM1 / 14 · 1.71 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD0 / 27 · 0.44 xG
EDM0 / 36 · 0.58 xG

EDM went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.23 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
2 G · 3.20 xG · -1.2
EDM
1 G · 3.52 xG · -2.5
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. AllenNJD
+2.5
T. JarryEDM
+1.2

NJD finished -1.2 against expected, EDM -2.5 — J. Allen (NJD) saved 2.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST0/21
SNAP2/7
SLAP0/0
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
EDM
WRIST0/21
SNAP0/3
SLAP0/9
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
NJD
EDM
Off the rush
1 G on 23 · 2.28 xG
0 G on 23 · 2.45 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.06 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.56 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 0-for-21, EDM 0-for-21.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Glass
#12 · C · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 14:34 TOI · +2
A. Gritsyuk
#81 · R · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 13:05 TOI · +2
D. Hamilton
#7 · D · NJD
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:55 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Allen (NJD) stopped 2.5 goals above expected.
  • EDM couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • EDM created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • EDM underperformed xG by 2.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Allen (NJD) saved 2.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Allen was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at EDM · 10:00 PM ET

Devils at Oilers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:09 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
EDM
Model favorite
46%
54%
NJD50EDM

EDM by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.52.7 EDM; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →EDM
50.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
51.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.45xGF / 602.64
2.50xGA / 602.47
1.66Goals for / gm2.13
2.23Goals against / gm2.29
0.971PDO — luck, not skill0.982

EDM holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.971 vs 0.982) says EDM has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees this as essentially a pick'em. Oddsmakers project a 2.5-to-2.7-goal game with Edmonton at 54% win probability—close enough that the Oilers' slight edge is barely meaningful.

New Jersey sits underwater at -14 goal differential over its last 10 games. The Devils have better possession numbers (50.0% xG%, 51.0% Corsi%) than the eye-line may suggest, but neither team dominates the underlying play. Edmonton edges them in expected goals share (52.0% xG%) while trailing in shot volume (50.0% Corsi%).

Both teams have PDOs screaming regression. Edmonton sits at 0.982; New Jersey at 0.971. That's cold on both sides. Positive variance is coming for whoever can take it.

C. Ingram handles the Devils' net on back-to-back—watch whether New Jersey starts a fresh arm or leans on a fatigued starter.

The real danger zones belong to the stars. Timo Meier drives the Devils, sitting at 1.08 xG per 60 with 13 goals and 15 assists, including 3 high-danger chances and a 6.7% shooting rate that leaves room for variance. Jack Hughes (0.88 xG/60, 18G 17A, 11.5% shoot rate) is the creative engine, though his 1 high-danger goal suggests finishing upside.

Edmonton's high-end talent is scarier. Connor McDavid (0.92 xG/60, 25G 33A, 5 HD goals, 13.7% shoot rate) generates and converts. Zach Hyman (1.23 xG/60, 14G 13A, 13.0% shoot rate) is their most dangerous volume scorer—his high-danger conversion rate sits at just 1 goal from his chances, leaving room for both positive and negative regression.

New Jersey's defense hinges on Johnathan Kovacevic, a known weak link. Edmonton has Jake Walman in the same position. Both teams are generating 0% of their goals from high-danger and rebound situations—a stat that can't last. Whoever normalizes first gets a small edge in a game that's otherwise a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
EDM
Zach Hyman14G 13A
1.23 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.0% sh
Connor McDavid25G 33A
0.92 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters