Backcheck
Recap · NYR at LAK

A. Forsberg stands tall as the Kings edge the Rangers

The Kings won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:57 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
3
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.71Expected goals4.77
50% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)27
10High-danger chances5
64Corsi (all attempts)71
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

A. Forsberg stole this game. The Kings' goaltender saved 3.7 goals above expected — making 27 of 28 saves at 0.964 SV% — while the Rangers wasted a 10–5 edge in high-danger chances.

Expected goals barely split, 4.77 to 4.71. Yet the Rangers' quality didn't translate: zero goals on 10 high-danger attempts. The Kings, meanwhile, were ruthless in that zone, scoring 2 on 5 (40%). The Rangers underperformed their expected total by 1.71 goals, the margin that lost the game.

Shot volume favored the Rangers (36 on goal versus 27), but the Kings controlled 43% of attempts. On the rush, both teams were lethal: two apiece off 29 chances for the Kings, two off 20 for the Rangers. But the high-danger zone is where precision kills. The Rangers generated 11 rebound chances and converted zero. The Kings created four and buried one.

J.T. Miller's snap shot from the wing late in the third period was the turning point.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 10 · 2.35 xG
LAK2 / 5 · 1.87 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR2 / 14 · 1.76 xG
LAK1 / 19 · 2.24 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 40 · 0.60 xG
LAK1 / 47 · 0.66 xG

NYR went 0-for-10 from high danger on 2.35 expected goals — 2.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 4.71 xG · -1.7
LAK
4 G · 4.77 xG · -0.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. QuickNYR
+0.8
A. ForsbergLAK
+2.7
D. KuemperLAK
-1.0

NYR finished -1.7 against expected, LAK -0.8 — A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST0/34
SLAP0/5
TIP IN1/4
SNAP1/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/15
LAK
WRIST1/20
SLAP1/9
TIP IN0/6
SNAP1/7
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/23
NYR
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.78 xG
2 G on 29 · 2.26 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 11 · 1.94 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.54 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 0-for-34, LAK 1-for-20. NYR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Miller
#8 · C · NYR
2 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 21:35 TOI · +1
K. Fiala
#22 · L · LAK
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 17:43 TOI · +2
V. Gavrikov
#44 · D · NYR
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 25:24 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 2.7 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (LAK 5, NYR 10).
  • LAK was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • NYR couldn't convert — 0/10 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • LAK created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 11 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR underperformed xG by 1.7 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 3.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at LAK · 10:00 PM ET

The Kings are the model's lean over the Rangers on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 1:54 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
LAK
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50LAK

LAK by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.22.5 LAK; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →LAK
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.26xGF / 602.42
2.40xGA / 602.20
1.88Goals for / gm1.85
1.90Goals against / gm1.71
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.002) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Los Angeles is favored by the projection model, which assigns the Kings a 55% win probability in a 2.2-2.5 goal game. The lean rests on territorial control and conversion efficiency.

At 5v5, the Kings dominate both metrics. They generate expected goals at 52.0% to the Rangers' 48.0%, and control Corsi (a puck-possession proxy) at 52.0% to 49.0%. These gaps compound—more time with the puck yields more quality looks and forces tighter defensive structures.

The durability of these advantages matters. The Kings' PDO sits at 1.002, indicating they're converting at expected rates. The Rangers stand at 1.009, suggesting they're running slightly lucky. In a tight projection, structural edges beat variance. Los Angeles's advantages are repeatable; New York's are partly noise.

The recent record underscores this tilt. The Kings have weathered choppy waters over their last ten (3-3-4, minus-8 goal differential) but remained competitive. The Rangers are significantly worse—minus-17 goal differential—with offensive and defensive decline both evident. Los Angeles will enter as the sharper team.

Players to Watch

NYR

  • Adam Sykora — 0.91 xG/60, 3G 1A, 20.0% shooting
  • Gabe Perreault — 0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A, 2 HD goals, 13.1% shooting

LAK

  • Alex Laferriere — 0.87 xG/60, 16G 18A, 2 HD goals, 9.9% shooting
  • Jared Wright — 0.83 xG/60, 0G 4A

Both teams lack depth scoring and neither generates high-danger goals (0% HD goal rate) or converts rebounds (0% rebound goal rate). The Rangers' defensive liability is Vincent Iorio; the Kings' is Adrian Kempe. These vulnerabilities bite when you're defending most of the night, which New York will be.

The Kings' structural edge should let them dictate play and create tighter scoring chances. Whether they finish is the only open question.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters