Backcheck
Recap · CHI at CAR

Blackhawks edge the Hurricanes in a shootout

The Blackhawks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.61–4.61 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:05 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
4
Home
CAR
Carolina Hurricanes
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.61Expected goals4.61
56% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)31
7High-danger chances7
38Corsi (all attempts)71
Score-adjusted: 35% / 65%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Chicago stole this game. Carolina owned 56% of expected goals—4.61 to 3.61—and still lost in a shootout. The Hurricanes controlled play but couldn't convert; the Blackhawks got the result anyway.

The disparity traced to execution. Carolina held 58% of shot attempts (31 to 22) and generated 7 high-danger chances to Chicago's 7. But Chicago's looks were sharper: 0.095 xG per shot versus 0.065. Efficiency, not volume, won this one.

S. Knight, Chicago's goaltender, was the difference. He saved 1.61 goals above expected on 28 saves, working to a 0.903 save percentage when the numbers said he should concede more. F. Andersen stopped 0.61 goals above expected for Carolina but it wasn't enough; the Hurricanes' inability to convert on 3 rebounding opportunities cost them in the margins.

Oliver Moore's snap shot from the slot in the shootout ended it.

Carolina converted 3 times on 36 rush chances while Chicago converted 2 on 19. Both teams had opportunities off the rush, but the game's margin was Chicago's efficiency in other areas.

Three Stars

  • I. Mikheyev (CHI)—1G, 1A in 18:35
  • J. Slavin (CAR)—1A in 23:32
  • C. Murphy (CHI)—1G in 22:17
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI2 / 7 · 2.31 xG
CAR1 / 7 · 1.60 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI1 / 8 · 0.91 xG
CAR2 / 22 · 2.23 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 23 · 0.39 xG
CAR0 / 42 · 0.77 xG

CAR went 0-for-42 from low danger on 0.77 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
4 G · 3.61 xG · +0.4
CAR
3 G · 4.61 xG · -1.6
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. KnightCHI
+1.6
F. AndersenCAR
+0.6

CHI finished +0.4 against expected, CAR -1.6 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
SNAP1/17
WRIST1/9
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND1/3
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/6
CAR
SNAP2/29
WRIST1/7
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/5
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/18
CHI
CAR
Off the rush
2 G on 19 · 2.66 xG
3 G on 36 · 3.50 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.77 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.28 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-17, CAR 2-for-29. CAR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
I. Mikheyev
#95 · R · CHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 18:35 TOI · +2
J. Slavin
#74 · D · CAR
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 23:32 TOI · +2
C. Murphy
#5 · D · CHI
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 22:17 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CHI stole this one. CAR owned 56% of the xG and lost.
  • S. Knight (CHI) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
  • CHI had the higher quality looks — 0.095 xG/shot vs 0.065.
  • CAR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • CAR created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CAR underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at CAR · 7:00 PM ET

The Hurricanes should handle the Blackhawks — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 2:11 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

64%
CAR
Model favorite
36%
64%
CHI50CAR

CAR by 28 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.23.1 CAR; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →CAR
42.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
46.0%Corsi%60.0%
2.17xGF / 602.98
2.94xGA / 602.31
1.84Goals for / gm2.26
2.41Goals against / gm1.95
0.996PDO — luck, not skill0.984

CAR holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 0.984) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a CHI 2.2 - 3.1 CAR game with the Hurricanes at 64% win probability. Carolina controls the underlying play.

Carolina dominates the expected goals metric: 56.0% 5v5 xG share compared to Chicago's 42.0%. That advantage extends across the possession game—the Hurricanes drive 60.0% Corsi, which tilts territorial control decisively in their direction.

Here's the real edge: Carolina is running cold with a 0.984 PDO, well below the expected baseline. That regresses upward. Chicago sits at 0.996 PDO, which means their luck has already turned. The PDO gap favors the Hurricanes.

Tyler Bertuzzi carries Chicago's offense: 0.85 xG/60 with 20 goals and 15 assists, though his 18.0% shooting rate suggests some regression ahead. Connor Bedard backs him up at 0.82 xG/60, with 17 goals and 27 assists at 11.8% efficiency.

Carolina counters with Jackson Blake, who drives at 1.06 xG/60—the highest rate in the matchup—with 14 goals and 19 assists on 10.9% shooting. Seth Jarvis provides secondary firepower: 0.98 xG/60, 17 goals and 12 assists at 11.9%.

The defensive mismatch favors Carolina. Anton Frondell represents Chicago's weak link; Blake will target him. Charles Alexis Legault becomes the vulnerability for Carolina, exposed to Bertuzzi and Bedard.

The PDO regression math favors the Hurricanes.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters