Backcheck
Recap · WSH at SEA

Kraken pull away from the Capitals

The Kraken earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:54 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
1
Home
SEA
Seattle Kraken
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.69Expected goals3.88
59% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)32
3High-danger chances6
47Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 48% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The scoreboard read 5-1, but expected goals said a different story—one where Seattle controlled play without dominating by quite that much. The Kraken held 59% of 5v5 xG (3.88–2.69), a clear edge that didn't explain a 4-goal win alone.

Goaltending variance created the gap. P. Grubauer saved 1.69 goals above expected; L. Thompson gave up 1.1 more than expected, well below what his workload demanded. Together, this swing accounted for nearly all of Seattle's margin beyond their xG advantage.

Grubauer's dominance stood out even in Seattle's strong overall performance. The Kraken were lethal on the rush (3 goals on 30 chances), thrived in low-danger areas where goalies should tighten up, and crashed the net effectively (6 rebound opportunities, 2 converted). Washington, conversely, underperformed their xG by 1.7—they wasted quality chances.

Matty Beniers's wrist shot from the slot at 16:27 of the third sealed the result.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 3 · 0.76 xG
SEA2 / 6 · 1.35 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH0 / 13 · 1.56 xG
SEA1 / 16 · 1.81 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 31 · 0.36 xG
SEA2 / 41 · 0.72 xG

WSH went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.56 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
1 G · 2.69 xG · -1.7
SEA
5 G · 3.88 xG · +1.1
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
-1.1
P. GrubauerSEA
+1.7

WSH finished -1.7 against expected, SEA +1.1 — P. Grubauer (SEA) saved 1.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST0/16
SNAP1/2
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/18
SEA
WRIST4/27
SNAP0/10
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP1/4
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/16
WSH
SEA
Off the rush
1 G on 23 · 2.20 xG
3 G on 30 · 2.48 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.30 xG
2 G on 6 · 1.05 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 0-for-16, SEA 4-for-27. SEA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. McCann
#19 · L · SEA
2 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 14:11 TOI · +3
M. Beniers
#10 · C · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:35 TOI · +3
J. Eberle
#7 · R · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 15:07 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • P. Grubauer (SEA) stopped 1.7 goals above expected.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) gave up 1.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • SEA scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • SEA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • SEA created 6 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH underperformed xG by 1.7 — wasted quality chances.
  • P. Grubauer (SEA) saved 1.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at SEA · 10:00 PM ET

Capitals at Kraken: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:52 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
WSH
Model favorite
51%
49%
WSH50SEA

WSH by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.62.5 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →SEA
50.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
49.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.62xGF / 602.13
2.62xGA / 602.51
2.18Goals for / gm1.87
1.79Goals against / gm1.95
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.011

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.011) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model has Washington favored at 51% win probability, which is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. The projection: 2.6 goals for the Capitals, 2.5 for Seattle.

The edge belongs to Washington's underlying play. At 5v5, the Capitals own 50.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi — territorial control that typically compounds over 60 minutes. Seattle sits at 46.0% xG and 45.0% Corsi. Washington's PDO of 1.018 suggests some regression coming, but their offensive structure is genuinely better.

The catch: both teams are in freefall. Washington and Seattle each carry a -6 goal differential over their last 10 games, meaning both are underperforming their models. When two teams this cold collide, form trumps fancy analytics.

The Capitals' firepower centers on Alex Ovechkin, who carries 0.97 xG per 60 minutes and has 19 goals with a 13.8% shooting percentage — he's both generating chances and converting them. Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, 10.4% shooting) provides secondary punch. Seattle counters with Shane Wright (0.77 xG/60, 8 goals, 4 high-danger goals) and Berkly Catton (0.68 xG/60, 6 goals, 8.8% shooting, 5 high-danger goals), but neither matches the Capitals' top-end creation rate.

Defensively, Washington has a weak link in Declan Chisholm; Seattle's is Chandler Stephenson. Neither team has scored from high-danger situations or rebounds, muting any advantage from the other's defensive lapses.

The verdict stands: Washington should win. Whether they will is the coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters