Backcheck
Recap · NYR at NYI

Islanders run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:11 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
2
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

1.86Expected goals3.76
67% share for the better side
16Shot attempts (SOG)36
0High-danger chances4
44Corsi (all attempts)62
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders beat the Rangers 5-2 with a performance that left no ambiguity. They converted high-danger chances 4–0, controlled 69% of shot attempts (36–16), and posted 67% of 5v5 expected goals (3.76–1.86).

The gap in shot quality proved decisive. The Islanders generated 0.061 expected goals per shot to the Rangers' 0.042, a difference that separated opportunistic hockey from desperation. They scored three times on 28 rush chances; the Rangers twice on 18. The power play went the Islanders' way: two goals on 15 shots (1.16 xG).

The Islanders overperformed their expected goals by 1.24—a sign of clinical finishing. S. Martin's save percentage of 0.861 was 1.24 goals below league-average for his workload, an underperformance that merely punctuated a game the Islanders controlled from start to finish.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 0 · 0.00 xG
NYI1 / 4 · 0.99 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 10 · 1.33 xG
NYI4 / 18 · 2.07 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 34 · 0.53 xG
NYI0 / 40 · 0.70 xG

NYI went 4-for-18 from medium danger on 2.07 expected goals — 1.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
2 G · 1.86 xG · +0.1
NYI
5 G · 3.76 xG · +1.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. MartinNYR
-1.2
D. RittichNYI
-0.1

NYR finished +0.1 against expected, NYI +1.2 — S. Martin (NYR) allowed 1.2 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST1/13
SNAP1/5
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/16
NYI
WRIST0/17
SNAP3/11
TIP IN1/9
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/14
NYR
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 18 · 1.45 xG
3 G on 28 · 2.88 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.05 xG
1 G on 6 · 0.58 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-13, NYI 0-for-17. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Holmstrom
#10 · R · NYI
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 15:53 TOI · +1
J. Pageau
#44 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 13:31 TOI · +2
O. Palat
#81 · L · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 11:53 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Martin (NYR) gave up 1.2 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NYI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.061 xG/shot vs 0.042. Quality over quantity.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • NYI created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 15 PP shots (1.16 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

Rangers at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:52 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
NYI
Model favorite
48%
52%
NYR50NYI

NYI by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYR 2.52.6 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →NYI
48.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
49.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.48
2.40xGA / 602.69
1.88Goals for / gm1.78
1.90Goals against / gm1.94
1.009PDO — luck, not skill0.993

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.009 vs 0.993) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model calls this even: the Islanders at 52% win probability, a projected score between 2.5 and 2.6, and no structural advantage to either team. In a league of decisive outcomes, this is as close to a coin flip as the numbers permit.

The Islanders have run warmer—5 wins, 4 losses, and 1 overtime loss over their last 10 games gives them a points-per-game rate that edges New York's. But the Rangers are underwater at minus-19 goal differential over that span, a gap that whispers beneath the record. Two teams on opposite recent trajectories arriving at the same projected line.

The underlying metrics explain the stalemate. At even strength, both clubs post 48.0% expected goals and 49.0% Corsi percentages—identical to the tenth of a point. The Rangers' PDO of 1.009 suggests unsustainable luck; the Islanders' 0.993 suggests the opposite. When two teams generate identical play quality yet post different results, neither has captured an edge.

Both goalies navigate back-to-backs. I. Sorokin and J. Quick may start taxed or cede to backups, a variable the model cannot quantify but the arena will feel.

Players to Watch

NYR: Adam Sykora (3G, 1A, 0.91 xG/60, 20.0% SH%) and Gabe Perreault (8G, 11A, 2 HD goals, 0.79 xG/60, 13.1% SH%).

NYI: Anders Lee (9G, 20A, 1.20 xG/60, 2 HD goals, 6.4% SH%) and Bo Horvat (18G, 10A, 0.87 xG/60, 3 HD goals, 12.8% SH%).

The margin separating these teams is a rounding error. Expect a result that settles nothing.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters