Motion-blurred skater in a Nashville Predators sweater
Breakdown · NSH at SEA

J. Saros stands tall as the Predators edge the Kraken

The verdict · stolen

The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.81–5.05 and won anyway.

NSH 4 · SEA 2
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:43 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Nashville won 4–2 despite being out-chanced 5.05–3.81 in expected goals. This was not a convincing victory; it was a theft.

J. Saros made it possible. The Predators' goalie stopped 43 of 45 shots and finished 3.05 goals better than expected—nearly enough to overcome a lopsided disadvantage in shot quality. Seattle's J. Daccord kept his team closer than they deserved (23/26, +0.81 xG), but he couldn't compensate for Nashville's ruthlessness.

The Predators capitalized on the chances that mattered. They converted 2 of 5 high-danger opportunities (40%), then struck three times on 27 rush attempts. Steven Stamkos's wrist shot from the wing at 19:55 of the third period marked the turning point. Seattle generated volume—9 high-danger chances to Nashville's 5, plus 12 rebound opportunities—but finished only once on those rebounds. They held 62% of shot attempts yet could not overcome a goaltender playing like he had something to prove.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 10
NSH
4
SEA
2

J. Saros stands tall as the Predators edge the Kraken

Chances 3.8 – 5.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Kraken deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NSH
3.81
SEA
5.05
43% of the chances57%

The board read NSH 4, SEA 2. The chances read NSH 3.8, SEA 5.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NSH
+0.2
goals above expected
NSH3.81 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
SEA5.05 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Kraken left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 02:14SEAK. Kakko0–1
  2. P1 09:46SEAM. Beniers0–2
  3. P2 04:14NSHT. Jost1–2
  4. P2 10:19NSHR. Schaefer2–2
  5. P2 14:25NSHR. Ufko3–2
  6. P3 19:55NSHS. StamkosEN4–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NSH
43 shots
4
Final
103 shots
SEA
60 shots
2
NSH attackSEA attack
NSH SEA Goal
43
shots · 4 in
60
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NSHSEA
2 / 5
1.88 xG
High danger
1 / 9
2.00 xG
1 / 10
1.25 xG
Medium
1 / 18
2.12 xG
1 / 47
0.68 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.93 xG

The Predators buried 2 of 5 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Saros
+3.0
NSH · 43/45
B+
J. Daccord
+0.8
SEA · 23/26
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

J. Saros stands tall as the Predators edge the Kraken

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–19
  1. 02:14SEAK. Kakko(S. Wright)0–1
  2. 09:46SEAM. Beniers(J. McCann, V. Dunn)0–2
2ndshots 11–16
  1. 04:14NSHT. Jost(F. Svechkov, J. Marchessault)1–2
  2. 10:19NSHR. Schaefer(M. Wood, B. Skjei)2–2
  3. 14:25NSHR. Ufko(J. Marchessault, R. O'Reilly)3–2
3rdshots 9–10
  1. 19:55NSHS. Stamkosempty net(N. Hague)4–2

score reads NSH–SEA

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.81
NSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.2
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.036
NSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
47.0%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.81Expected goals5.05
SEA 57% of the chance quality
27Shots on goal45
5High-danger chances9
62All attempts (Corsi)70
Adjusted for score: NSH 49% · SEA 51%
Faceoffs · SEA won64%off25%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH2 / 5 · 1.88 xG
SEA1 / 9 · 2.00 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 10 · 1.25 xG
SEA1 / 18 · 2.12 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH1 / 47 · 0.68 xG
SEA0 / 43 · 0.93 xG

SEA went 1-for-18 from medium danger on 2.12 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
4 G · 3.81 xG · +0.2
SEA
2 G · 5.05 xG · -3.0
0123456

NSH finished +0.2 against expected, SEA -3.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST4/28
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/0
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/19
SEA
WRIST2/33
BACKHAND0/10
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/5
BAT0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
POKE0/0
OTHER0/10
NSH
SEA
Off the rush
3 G on 27
1.92 xG
1 G on 33
2.37 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0
0.00 xG
1 G on 12
1.94 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 4-for-28, SEA 2-for-33. NSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Saros
NSH · 43/45 · .956
+3.0
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/92.0+1.0
Medium1/182.1+1.1
Low0/430.9+0.9

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Daccord
SEA · 23/26 · .885
+0.8
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/51.9-0.1
Medium1/101.3+0.3
Low1/470.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

103 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NSH
43 shots
4
Final
103 shots
SEA
60 shots
2
NSH attackSEA attack
NSH SEA Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NSH left, SEA right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Marchessault
#81 · R · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:56 on ice · +2
N. Hague
#41 · D · NSH
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 24:31 on ice · +2
B. Skjei
#76 · D · NSH
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 23:24 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Mar 10
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:42 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 goal game with the Predators at 50% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Nashville holds the underlying advantage. The Predators generate at 49.0% expected goals share against Seattle's 46.0%—a three-point edge in quality chances—and control shot volume at 50.0% Corsi% to the Kraken's 45.0%. That territorial tilt should matter. Yet Seattle's luck is running hot: a 1.011 PDO reveals they're converting beyond their underlying quality, while Nashville's 0.992 sits below expectation. The gap is real but not determinative. Both teams are solid; neither has run away with the advantage column.

The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0%, which means Nashville owns the territorial battle. Expect them to spend most of the night in Seattle's zone.

Players to Watch

Nashville: Zachary L'Heureux carries 0.85 expected goals per 60 with 4 goals, 0 assists, on 16.0% shooting; 1 is a high-danger chance. Filip Forsberg leads with 23 goals and 17 assists at 0.80 xG/60, 4 high-danger goals, and 13.6% shooting—indicators of outperformance that may not hold.

Seattle: Shane Wright sits at 0.77 xG/60 with 8 goals and 10 assists on 10.4% shooting; 4 come from high-danger chances. Berkly Catton posts 0.68 xG/60, 6 goals, 8 assists, with 5 high-danger goals, all at an unsustainable 8.8% clip.

Both teams register 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate, meaning they're avoiding secondary-chance finishes. That similarity in structure makes the matchup harder to separate on tactical grounds.

Nashville's defensive liability is Jonathan Marchessault. Seattle's is Chandler Stephenson. In a game this tight, discipline and turnover avoidance become decisive.

This is the rare matchup where underlying talent, structural similarity, and luck balance so perfectly that the 50% projection isn't evasion—it's the most accurate answer available.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NSH 50%
50%
NSH
Model favorite
50%
50%
NSH50SEA

NSH by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.5–2.5 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH← edge
edge →SEA
49.0%46.0%
50.0%45.0%
2.482.13
2.582.51
1.841.87
2.211.95
0.9921.011

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (0.992 vs 1.011) says SEA has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NSH
4-4-2
-1 GD · 3d rest
SEA
5-5-0
-2 GD · 2d rest
0.992
NSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.011
SEA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NSH
Expected in goal
J. Saros
3 days rest.875 last start
Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

SEA
Expected in goal
J. Daccord
2 days rest.811 last start
Backup Joey Daccord · -6.2 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next