Motion-blurred skater in a green sweater
Breakdown · EDM at DAL

Stars pull away from the Oilers

The verdict · stolen

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.36–3.54 and won anyway.

EDM 2 · DAL 7
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:55 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Dallas 7, Edmonton 2: a scoreline that inverts the underlying play. The Oilers controlled 55% of expected goals (4.36 to 3.54), yet the Stars flipped it into a five-goal rout.

Goaltending won this one. J. Oettinger was immaculate—30 saves on 32 shots, +2.36 against expectation, and perfect on high-danger chances (10-for-10). T. Jarry was not: 20 saves on 27 shots, -3.46 against expectation, a full three goals below his workload.

Edmonton created the better looks. Ten high-danger chances to Dallas's six, six rebound opportunities (zero converted). On the rush, Dallas punished theirs (6 goals on 24 attempts) while Edmonton couldn't (2 on 23).

The variance column tells the story: Dallas overperformed their xG by 3.5 goals, Edmonton underperformed theirs by 2.4. When it mattered, the Stars executed.

Matt Duchene's backhander from the doorstep at 18:57 of the third marked the game's turning point.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 12
EDM
2
DAL
7

Stars pull away from the Oilers

Chances 4.4 – 3.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Oilers deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
EDM
4.36
DAL
3.54
55% of the chances45%

The board read EDM 2, DAL 7. The chances read EDM 4.4, DAL 3.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DAL
+3.5
goals above expected
DAL3.54 expected · 7 scored
Expected
Scored
EDM4.36 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Stars scored 3.5 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:23DALJ. Benn0–1
  2. P1 13:09DALS. Steel0–2
  3. P1 15:11DALJ. Robertson0–3
  4. P2 05:43DALW. JohnstonPP0–4
  5. P2 06:15DALJ. Robertson0–5
  6. P2 07:53EDME. Bouchard1–5
  7. P2 11:59EDMJ. Dickinson2–5
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
EDM
44 shots
2
Final
80 shots
DAL
36 shots
7
EDM attackDAL attack
EDM DAL Goal
44
shots · 2 in
36
shots · 7 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
EDMDAL
0 / 10
2.65 xG
High danger
1 / 6
1.84 xG
2 / 9
1.03 xG
Medium
5 / 11
1.32 xG
0 / 32
0.68 xG
Low
1 / 27
0.38 xG

The Oilers went 0 for 10 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Oettinger
+2.4
DAL · 30/32
F
T. Jarry
−3.5
EDM · 20/27
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Stars pull away from the Oilers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 4–10
  1. 01:23DALJ. Benn(M. Heiskanen, S. Steel)0–1
  2. 13:09DALS. Steel(M. Duchene, M. Bourque)0–2
  3. 15:11DALJ. Robertson0–3
2ndshots 11–11
  1. 05:43DALW. Johnstonpower play(J. Robertson, M. Heiskanen)0–4
  2. 06:15DALJ. Robertson(W. Johnston, M. Heiskanen)0–5
  3. 07:53EDME. Bouchard(K. Kapanen, L. Draisaitl)1–5
  4. 11:59EDMJ. Dickinson(M. Ekholm, J. Roslovic)2–5
3rdshots 17–6
  1. 01:32DALJ. Bennpower play(J. Robertson, W. Johnston)2–6
  2. 18:57DALM. Duchene(C. Blackwell, E. Lindell)2–7

score reads EDM–DAL

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.54
DAL chances
Goals their shots were worth
+3.5
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.120
DAL puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
46.3%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

4.36Expected goals3.54
EDM 55% of the chance quality
32Shots on goal27
10High-danger chances6
51All attempts (Corsi)44
Adjusted for score: EDM 61% · DAL 39%
Faceoffs · DAL won50%off50%neu47%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
EDM0 / 10 · 2.65 xG
DAL1 / 6 · 1.84 xG
Medium dangermid-range
EDM2 / 9 · 1.03 xG
DAL5 / 11 · 1.32 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
EDM0 / 32 · 0.68 xG
DAL1 / 27 · 0.38 xG

DAL went 5-for-11 from medium danger on 1.32 expected goals — 3.7 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
EDM
2 G · 4.36 xG · -2.4
DAL
7 G · 3.54 xG · +3.5
012345678

EDM finished -2.4 against expected, DAL +3.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
EDM
SNAP1/19
SLAP0/10
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/4
WRIST0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/7
DAL
SNAP4/23
SLAP0/2
TIP IN1/3
BACKHAND2/4
WRIST0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/8
EDM
DAL
Off the rush
2 G on 23
2.35 xG
6 G on 24
2.87 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6
1.32 xG
0 G on 2
0.36 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: EDM went 1-for-19, DAL 4-for-23. DAL scored 6 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
T. Jarry
EDM · 20/27 · .741
-3.5
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.8+0.8
Medium5/111.3-3.7
Low1/270.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Oettinger
DAL · 30/32 · .938
+2.4
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/102.6+2.6
Medium2/91.0-1.0
Low0/320.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

80 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
EDM
44 shots
2
Final
80 shots
DAL
36 shots
7
EDM attackDAL attack
EDM DAL Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — EDM left, DAL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
2 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 17:17 on ice · +2
M. Heiskanen
#4 · D · DAL
0 G · 3 A · 0 SOG · 23:00 on ice · +3
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 18:18 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Mar 12
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:54 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The models see no daylight here. Edmonton projects to 2.5 goals, Dallas to 2.5, with the Stars holding a 51% win probability—this is as close to a toss as playoff hockey gets.

The Stars have earned it through form. They're 9-0-1 in their last 10, running at a hot points pace that makes them the hotter team entering puck drop. Yet that hot hand conceals a structural question: their PDO sits at 1.024, meaning they're converting at elite rates off average chances. Reversion is coming.

Edmonton, by contrast, is running cold. A 0.982 PDO signals they're due for positive regression—they're generating chances without finishing them yet.

Both teams drive play effectively at five-on-five. Edmonton holds the possession edge at Corsi 50.0%, while Dallas sits at 47.0%. On expected goals, the gap narrows: Edmonton 52.0%, Dallas 51.0%. These marginal differences explain why the models treat this as a coin flip. Neither team is pulling away in underlying metrics.

The Oilers' strength lies in volume. Expect a territorial tilt favoring Edmonton if both teams play their system. Dallas will defend in structure and punish on transition.

Goaltending could be the tilt. J. Oettinger backs up Friday and may start Saturday on the second of consecutive games—fatigue or a backup appearance both merit monitoring. C. Ingram faces the same back-to-back burden for Dallas. Whoever gets the nod will play a consequential game in an evenly matched series.

The roster matchups sharpen the edge. Zach Hyman (14G, 13A, 1.23 xG/60) is Edmonton's most dangerous forward; he's scoring at a 13.0% clip, a sign of shot quality and finish. Connor McDavid (25G, 33A, 0.92 xG/60) runs at 13.7% shooting—elite volume and elite efficiency, though his xG/60 lags Hyman's, suggesting Hyman is getting the very best looks.

Dallas counters with Jason Robertson (25G, 21A, 0.96 xG/60) at 12.4% shooting—comparable finishing talent, slightly fewer high-danger chances. Michael Bunting (8G, 14A) shoots at 7.6%, a more modest rate that tracks with his 0.83 xG/60; he's a playmaker first, finisher second.

The defensive weak link for Edmonton is Jake Walman. Dallas leans on Tyler Myers as the vulnerable back-end anchor. Both teams risk exposure if those defenders face sustained pressure.

This game turns on who exploits the PDO variance. Stars regression plus Oilers positive regression could flip the narrative entirely. The 51% pick favors Dallas, barely, because recent form still counts. But the models have seen enough in the underlying numbers to call this a genuine toss.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

DAL 51%
51%
DAL
Model favorite
49%
51%
EDM50DAL

DAL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score EDM 2.5–2.5 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
EDM← edge
edge →DAL
52.0%51.0%
50.0%47.0%
2.642.36
2.472.29
2.132.07
2.291.68
0.9821.024

EDM holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.982 vs 1.024) says DAL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
EDM
4-6-0
-2 GD · 1d rest
DAL
9-0-1
+18 GD · 1d rest
0.982
EDM PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.024
DAL PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Oilers drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.982 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Oilers drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • J. Oettinger is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • C. Ingram is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Stars are the hotter team by points pace (9-0-1 in their last 10).
  • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
EDM
Expected in goal
C. Ingram
back-to-back.889 last start
Backup Connor Ingram · +1.7 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

DAL
Expected in goal
J. Oettinger
back-to-back.963 last start
Backup Jake Oettinger · +5.7 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
EDM
Zach Hyman14G 13A
1.23 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.0% sh
Connor McDavid25G 33A
0.92 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Keep going

Where to next