Backcheck
Recap · WSH at STL

Blues shut out the Capitals, 3-0

The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:45 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
0
Home
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.21Expected goals4.48
67% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)27
1High-danger chances6
50Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 47% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The 3-0 scoreline obscured a closer game underneath. St. Louis won the expected goals battle 4.48 to 2.21 (67–33), but Washington's 2.21 xG yielded no goals—a 2.21-goal underperformance that explains the gap between their chances and the final. L. Thompson (WSH) overperformed by +2.48 goals, suggesting the Capitals played tighter than a shutout implies.

St. Louis was clinical. They generated superior shot quality (0.071 xG per attempt versus Washington's 0.044) and dominated high-danger chances 6-1. Jordan Kyrou's backhander from the slot at 19:19 of period 3 opened the door. The Blues finished two of 24 rush chances with goals, then closed it. J. Hofer (STL) made all 21 saves and overperformed by +2.21 goals.

Washington created three rebound chances but couldn't finish. Their one high-danger opportunity yielded nothing. L. Thompson played out of his mind (+2.48 above expected), yet it wasn't enough for a team that wasted its best looks.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH0 / 1 · 0.20 xG
STL2 / 6 · 2.03 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH0 / 12 · 1.34 xG
STL1 / 16 · 1.87 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 37 · 0.66 xG
STL0 / 41 · 0.58 xG

WSH went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.34 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
0 G · 2.21 xG · -2.2
STL
3 G · 4.48 xG · -1.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.5
J. HoferSTL
+2.2

WSH finished -2.2 against expected, STL -1.5 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST0/18
SNAP0/9
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/13
STL
WRIST0/18
SNAP1/7
SLAP1/7
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND1/7
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/19
WSH
STL
Off the rush
0 G on 26 · 1.68 xG
2 G on 24 · 2.79 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.34 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.63 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 0-for-18, STL 0-for-18. STL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
P. Broberg
#6 · D · STL
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:27 TOI · +2
L. Mailloux
#23 · D · STL
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:51 TOI · +2
J. Snuggerud
#21 · R · STL
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 16:27 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 2.5 goals above expected.
  • STL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.071 xG/shot vs 0.044. Quality over quantity.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • STL created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH underperformed xG by 2.2 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Hofer (STL) saved 2.2 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at STL · 8:00 PM ET

Capitals at Blues: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 8:42 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
STL
Model favorite
48%
52%
WSH50STL

STL by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.52.6 STL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →STL
50.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.62xGF / 602.34
2.62xGA / 602.40
2.18Goals for / gm2.00
1.79Goals against / gm2.12
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.000

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.000) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model says neither team has a meaningful edge. MoneyPuck projects a 2.5- to 2.6-goal-range game with St. Louis owning 52% win probability.

The Blues have run hot over their last 10 games, going 7-1-2, but the underlying five-on-five numbers erase any gap in talent. Washington holds a 50.0% expected goals share to St. Louis's 49.0%. The shot-attempt split is nearly identical: Washington at 49.0% Corsi, St. Louis at 48.0%. On paper, they're the same team.

Washington's luck is the variable. The Capitals are running a 1.018 PDO—well above neutral—while St. Louis sits at 1.000. That gap compounds over time, and regression is the only direction it moves. If it arrives in regulation, it's a Blues win.

The forwards are the story. Alex Ovechkin is generating 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 17 assists. Anthony Beauvillier sits at 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals and 9 assists. St. Louis counters with Jimmy Snuggerud (0.86 xG/60, 15 goals, 22 assists) and Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG/60, 13 goals, 24 assists).

Beauvillier shoots at 10.4%; Holloway at 10.8%. Both rates will move. The direction that movement goes matters more than any other variable tonight.

Defensively, Jimmy Snuggerud is St. Louis's liability; Declan Chisholm is Washington's. Whichever team limits its weak link through regulation wins. Everything else is secondary.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters