Backcheck
Recap · OTT at TBL

Lightning hold off the Senators

The Lightning earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 9:12 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
2
Home
TBL
Tampa Bay Lightning
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.77Expected goals4.94
57% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)27
8High-danger chances6
53Corsi (all attempts)77
Score-adjusted: 39% / 61%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Andrei Vasilevskiy's 0.929 save percentage decided this game. The Lightning beat the Senators 4-2, with Vasilevskiy posting 1.77 goals above expected on 26 of 28 saves. J. Reimer was 0.94 above expected on 23 of 27 but couldn't match that performance.

The underlying metrics mostly backed Tampa. They controlled 57% of expected goals at 5v5 (4.94–3.77), though the Senators had more high-danger chances (8–6). The Senators generated looks but couldn't convert: they underperformed their expected goals by 1.77, scoring 2 on 3.77 xG. The Lightning underperformed theirs by 0.94 but still posted 4.

Tampa's efficiency on the rush amplified the gap: 4 goals on 33 chances. The Senators crashed the net—6 rebound opportunities, 1 converted. That imbalance, paired with Vasilevskiy's brilliance, decided the outcome.

Jake Guentzel's wrist shot from the high slot at 17:48 of the second period was the turning point.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT1 / 8 · 2.01 xG
TBL2 / 6 · 2.05 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT0 / 11 · 1.15 xG
TBL2 / 20 · 2.28 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT1 / 34 · 0.60 xG
TBL0 / 51 · 0.61 xG

OTT went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.15 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
2 G · 3.77 xG · -1.8
TBL
4 G · 4.94 xG · -0.9
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. ReimerOTT
+0.9
A. VasilevskiyTBL
+1.8

OTT finished -1.8 against expected, TBL -0.9 — A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) saved 1.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
SNAP0/23
WRIST2/5
SLAP0/9
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/13
TBL
SNAP0/22
WRIST3/15
SLAP0/8
BACKHAND1/3
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/24
OTT
TBL
Off the rush
1 G on 20 · 1.51 xG
4 G on 33 · 3.61 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 6 · 1.50 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.07 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: OTT went 0-for-23, TBL 0-for-22. TBL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
E. Lilleberg
#78 · D · TBL
1 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 14:58 TOI · +4
B. Hagel
#38 · L · TBL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:17 TOI · +2
C. D'Astous
#51 · D · TBL
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 17:29 TOI · +4
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • TBL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • TBL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at TBL · 1:00 PM ET

Senators at Lightning: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 9:10 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
TBL
Model favorite
49%
51%
OTT50TBL

TBL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score OTT 2.52.5 TBL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →TBL
56.0%5v5 xG%54.0%
53.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.66xGF / 602.67
2.12xGA / 602.28
2.18Goals for / gm2.38
1.99Goals against / gm1.85
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.019

TBL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.019) says TBL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-2.5 game with the Lightning at 51% win probability—as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The underlying talent is similarly balanced. Ottawa carries a 56.0% xG edge over Tampa Bay's 54.0%, but both teams sit at exactly 53.0% Corsi. The Senators generate slightly cleaner chances, yet neither side dominates possession.

Tampa Bay is running hot. A 1.019 PDO means the Lightning are converting at a rate well above sustainable—expect regression.

Brady Tkachuk anchors Ottawa's offense with 1.19 xG/60, 11 goals and 20 assists. Dylan Cozens complements at 1.00 xG/60 with 13 goals and 15 assists. Tampa Bay counters with Brandon Hagel (1.10 xG/60, 23 goals, 26 assists) and Anthony Cirelli (0.95 xG/60, 15 goals, 18 assists).

The scoring profiles diverge subtly. Tkachuk and Hagel each have 2 hard-hat goals; Cozens has 1. Cirelli, meanwhile, has 5 hard-hat goals—an unusually high proportion of his total. That efficiency won't persist.

Shooting percentages reveal the real gap. Tkachuk operates at 7.5%, Cozens at 9.5%. Hagel shoots 15.8%, Cirelli 17.0%—elite rates that will regress. When the Lightning forwards cool, the PDO advantage evaporates.

Defensively, Nick Jensen is Ottawa's weak link, while Victor Hedman anchors Tampa Bay's backline liability. This is a genuine coin flip.

Three Stars to Watch

  • Brady Tkachuk (OTT): 11G, 20A, 1.19 xG/60
  • Brandon Hagel (TBL): 23G, 26A, 15.8% shooting
  • Anthony Cirelli (TBL): 15G, 18A, 17.0% shooting
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
TBL
Brandon Hagel23G 26A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 15.8% sh
Anthony Cirelli15G 18A
0.95 xG/60 · 5 HD · 17.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters