Backcheck
Recap · MIN at NSH

Predators steal one from the Wild against the run of play

The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.17–2.22 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 11:17 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MIN
Minnesota Wild
1
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.17Expected goals2.22
59% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)22
5High-danger chances2
61Corsi (all attempts)48
Score-adjusted: 60% / 40%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville won 2-1 despite Minnesota dominating the underlying play. The Wild controlled 59% of expected goals at 5-on-5 and held a 5–2 edge in high-danger chances. Yet Nashville's goaltending and sharpness overrode Minnesota's superior positioning.

The shot attempts split even at 22 each, but expected goals diverged sharply: Minnesota 3.17, Nashville 2.22. That 41-59 gap should have favored Minnesota. Instead, Nashville capitalized on its chances while Minnesota misfired. The Wild underperformed their xG by 2.17 goals, erasing any advantage their dominance had built.

J. Annunen (NSH) saved 2.17 goals above expected, a 0.955 save percentage that masked how thoroughly his team was outplayed. J. Wallstedt (MIN) stopped 20 of 22, posting a 0.909 save percentage that left Minnesota's superior play unrewarded.

Michael McCarron's snap from the slot in the third period crystallized Nashville's ruthlessness: a goal born from opportunism. S. Stamkos (NSH) orchestrated the attack with 1G and 1A in 21:33. R. O'Reilly (NSH) added an assist in 21:35. J. Brodin (MIN) contributed for the losing side with an assist in 18:50.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MIN1 / 5 · 1.13 xG
NSH0 / 2 · 0.47 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MIN0 / 13 · 1.50 xG
NSH2 / 10 · 1.15 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MIN0 / 43 · 0.54 xG
NSH0 / 36 · 0.60 xG

MIN went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.50 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MIN
1 G · 3.17 xG · -2.2
NSH
2 G · 2.22 xG · -0.2
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. WallstedtMIN
+0.2
J. AnnunenNSH
+2.2

MIN finished -2.2 against expected, NSH -0.2 — J. Annunen (NSH) saved 2.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MIN
WRIST0/26
SNAP1/6
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/18
NSH
WRIST1/16
SNAP0/7
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND1/2
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
MIN
NSH
Off the rush
0 G on 27 · 2.29 xG
1 G on 22 · 1.65 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.70 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.13 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 0-for-26, NSH 1-for-16.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Stamkos
#91 · C · NSH
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 21:33 TOI · +2
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:35 TOI · +1
J. Brodin
#25 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 18:50 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NSH won despite being outplayed by xG (41%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • NSH had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • J. Annunen (NSH) stopped 2.2 goals above expected.
  • MIN created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MIN underperformed xG by 2.2 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Annunen (NSH) saved 2.2 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MIN at NSH · 5:00 PM ET

Wild at Predators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 11:16 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
MIN
Model favorite
50%
50%
MIN50NSH

MIN by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score MIN 2.62.6 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MIN← edge
edge →NSH
52.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
48.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.55xGF / 602.48
2.40xGA / 602.58
2.04Goals for / gm1.84
1.93Goals against / gm2.21
1.007PDO — luck, not skill0.992

MIN holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.007 vs 0.992) says MIN has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6-2.6 game with Minnesota at 50% to win.

Minnesota owns the underlying play: a 52.0% 5v5 xG share against Nashville's 49.0%. That should typically decide hockey games. But the Corsi split complicates the story—Nashville leads 50.0% to 48.0%, suggesting the Predators control the flow despite conceding more chances. Minnesota's PDO of 1.007 versus Nashville's 0.992 bridges the gap: the Wild are running hot in conversion while the Predators run cold. The result is a genuine coin flip.

Both teams face identical uncertainty in net. J. Saros and F. Gustavsson are both on back-to-backs, meaning either side could deploy a backup or risk a fatigued starter.

Matt Boldy carries Minnesota's offense at 0.89 xG per 60, with 22 goals and 18 assists. He's converted 5 high-danger chances at a 13.7% rate—volume and precision in tandem. Robby Fabbri is likely unavailable, though he operates at 0.88 xG/60 when healthy. Nashville counters with Zachary L'Heureux, generating chances at 0.85 xG/60 despite just 4 goals; his 16.0% shooting rate points to regression. Filip Forsberg anchors the Predators with 0.80 xG/60, 23 goals, 17 assists, and 4 high-danger goals at a 13.6% clip.

The defensive seams matter in a game this close. Matt Kiersted is Minnesota's liability; Jonathan Marchessault is Nashville's. Either breakdown creates the margin.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters