Motion-blurred skater in a San Jose Sharks sweater
Breakdown · SJS at NSH

Sharks hold off the Predators

The verdict · stolen

The Sharks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.29–3.91 and won anyway.

SJS 3 · NSH 2
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 11:48 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Sharks' 3-2 win masks a closer underlying battle. Expected goals split 3.91–3.29 in Nashville's favor—the Predators dominated in quality but couldn't convert.

The Predators controlled play. They held 55% of shot attempts (28–23 on goal), led expected goals 54–46%, and generated more high-danger chances (9–5). They crashed the net effectively, creating five rebound opportunities with one conversion. By underlying metrics, Nashville was the better team.

San Jose won on execution and goaltending. A. Nedeljkovic stopped 1.9 goals above expected—the difference maker. The Predators underperformed their xG by 1.91 goals, squandering quality chances at crucial moments. J. Annunen was solid (20 saves, 0.909 SV%, +1.29 vs expected), but it wasn't enough.

The Sharks exploited the rush. On just 27 rush chances, San Jose converted two into goals, turning possessions into points with ruthless precision.

L. Evangelista's deflection from the doorstep at 18:50 marked the turning point in the third, but Nedeljkovic's wall held.

M. Celebrini led the Sharks with two goals in 19:34. Evangelista tallied two for Nashville in 19:06, while R. Ufko added two assists in 16:30.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Apr 13
SJS
3
NSH
2

Sharks hold off the Predators

Chances 3.3 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Predators deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
SJS
3.29
NSH
3.91
46% of the chances54%

The board read SJS 3, NSH 2. The chances read SJS 3.3, NSH 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
SJS
−0.3
goals above expected
SJS3.29 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NSH3.91 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Predators left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 09:53SJSI. ChernyshovPP1–0
  2. P3 03:04SJSM. Celebrini2–0
  3. P3 15:39NSHL. Evangelista2–1
  4. P3 18:15SJSM. CelebriniEN3–1
  5. P3 18:50NSHL. EvangelistaPP3–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
SJS
41 shots
3
Final
84 shots
NSH
43 shots
2
SJS attackNSH attack
SJS NSH Goal
41
shots · 3 in
43
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
SJSNSH
1 / 5
1.37 xG
High danger
2 / 9
2.17 xG
2 / 11
1.18 xG
Medium
0 / 11
1.13 xG
0 / 36
0.73 xG
Low
0 / 41
0.61 xG

High-danger looks: SJS 1 of 5, NSH 2 of 9.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
A. Nedeljkovic
+1.9
SJS · 26/28
B+
J. Annunen
+1.3
NSH · 20/22
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Sharks hold off the Predators

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 11–6no goals
    2ndshots 5–9
    1. 09:53SJSI. Chernyshovpower play(W. Eklund, M. Misa)1–0
    3rdshots 7–13
    1. 03:04SJSM. Celebrini(I. Chernyshov, W. Smith)2–0
    2. 15:39NSHL. Evangelista(N. Perbix, R. Ufko)2–1
    3. 18:15SJSM. Celebriniempty net(C. Graf, A. Wennberg)3–1
    4. 18:50NSHL. Evangelistapower play(R. Ufko, R. Josi)3–2

    score reads SJS–NSH

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.29
    SJS chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.3
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.025
    SJS puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    46.0%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.29Expected goals3.91
    NSH 54% of the chance quality
    23Shots on goal28
    5High-danger chances9
    52All attempts (Corsi)61
    Adjusted for score: SJS 43% · NSH 57%
    Faceoffs · NSH won54%off33%neu56%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    SJS1 / 5 · 1.37 xG
    NSH2 / 9 · 2.17 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    SJS2 / 11 · 1.18 xG
    NSH0 / 11 · 1.13 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    SJS0 / 36 · 0.73 xG
    NSH0 / 41 · 0.61 xG

    NSH went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.13 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    SJS
    3 G · 3.29 xG · -0.3
    NSH
    2 G · 3.91 xG · -1.9
    012345

    SJS finished -0.3 against expected, NSH -1.9.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    SJS
    WRIST2/22
    SLAP0/4
    SNAP1/4
    TIP IN0/5
    BACKHAND0/4
    POKE0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    DEFLECTED0/0
    OTHER0/11
    NSH
    WRIST1/24
    SLAP0/8
    SNAP0/5
    TIP IN0/2
    BACKHAND0/3
    POKE0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    DEFLECTED1/1
    OTHER0/18
    SJS
    NSH
    Off the rush
    2 G on 27
    2.55 xG
    1 G on 25
    2.35 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 2
    0.36 xG
    1 G on 5
    1.17 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 2-for-22, NSH 1-for-24. SJS scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    A. Nedeljkovic
    SJS · 26/28 · .929
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/92.2+0.2
    Medium0/111.1+1.1
    Low0/410.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Annunen
    NSH · 20/22 · .909
    +1.3
    saved above expected
    B+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/51.4+0.4
    Medium2/111.2-0.8
    Low0/360.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    84 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    SJS
    41 shots
    3
    Final
    84 shots
    NSH
    43 shots
    2
    SJS attackNSH attack
    SJS NSH Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — SJS left, NSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    M. Celebrini
    #71 · C · SJS
    2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 19:34 on ice · +2
    L. Evangelista
    #77 · R · NSH
    2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 19:06 on ice · +2
    R. Ufko
    #85 · D · NSH
    0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 16:30 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Mon, Apr 13
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 11:33 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.5–2.6 goal spread with Nashville favored at 53% to win, which is as close to a pick'em as you'll find in a league where most games have a clear favorite.

    San Jose enters on a slide, with a -6 goal differential over their last 10 games. That's not an anomaly correcting itself—it's a sign that even when they're generating chances, something's still breaking against them.

    The underlying numbers are tight. Nashville's xG% of 49.0% slightly edges San Jose's 48.0%, but the bigger tactical advantage is Corsi: the Predators control play at 50.0% to San Jose's 47.0%. That translates to territorial dominance—expect Nashville to set the pace and force San Jose into reaction mode.

    Goaltending becomes critical here. Y. Askarov is on a back-to-back, which means either a backup start or a tired starter who's already played hard. That's a pressure point for San Jose's offense if Askarov looks worn.

    On the ice, Pavol Regenda has been San Jose's offensive engine at 1.10 xG/60 with 5 goals and 1 assist, including 2 high-danger goals—but he's marked inactive for this game, removing a key scoring threat. Igor Chernyshov steps up with 6 goals and 8 assists at 0.91 xG/60. A 15.0% shooting rate suggests either he's due a regression or an unlucky streak is ending soon.

    For Nashville, Zachary L'Heureux has earned responsibility with 0.85 xG/60 and 4 goals, but notably 0 assists, indicating a shoot-first approach. Filip Forsberg anchors the lineup with 23 goals and 17 assists at 0.80 xG/60—less explosive than his teammates but more reliable, backed by 4 high-danger goals.

    The defensive weak link for San Jose is Chernyshov, creating a paradox: he's both the team's leading scorer and a liability on the other end. For Nashville, Jonathan Marchessault carries that burden.

    Both teams register 0% on high-danger and rebound goals, a statistical oddity suggesting either extreme variance or fundamentally different shot-placement patterns. Either way, don't expect garbage-time goals to decide this.

    With Nashville's territorial edge, goaltending fatigue possibly working against them, and Regenda's absence opening a crack in San Jose's offense, this is a genuine coin flip. The model's 53% mark for Nashville is justified—but barely.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NSH 53%
    53%
    NSH
    Model favorite
    47%
    53%
    SJS50NSH

    NSH by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SJS 2.5–2.6 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    SJS← edge
    edge →NSH
    48.0%49.0%
    47.0%50.0%
    2.332.48
    2.562.58
    1.991.84
    2.322.21
    0.9980.992

    NSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.998 vs 0.992) says SJS has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    SJS
    5-3-2
    -6 GD · 1d rest
    NSH
    5-4-1
    +3 GD · 2d rest
    0.998
    SJS PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.992
    NSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Things to watch
    • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • Y. Askarov is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Sharks are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    SJS
    Expected in goal
    Y. Askarov
    back-to-back.927 last start
    Backup Yaroslav Askarov · -18.9 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NSH
    Expected in goal
    J. Annunen
    2 days rest.955 last start
    Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    SJS
    Pavol Regenda5G 1A
    1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
    Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
    0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
    NSH
    Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
    0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
    Filip Forsberg23G 17A
    0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next