Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at CBJ

Capitals hold off the Blue Jackets

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 2 · CBJ 1
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 11:41 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Columbus controlled the volume but not the outcome. The Blue Jackets held 57% of shot attempts, yet the Capitals won 2-1 because Washington's shots were sharper — 0.077 expected goals per attempt versus Columbus's 0.058.

That quality gap crystallized in xG: Washington 4.14, Columbus 2.97, a 58-42 split in the Capitals' favor. High-danger chances followed, 8-5 Washington.

Both teams underperformed their xG — Washington by 2.14 goals, Columbus by 1.97 — yet their goalies overdelivered. C. Stevenson recorded 27 of 28 saves (0.964 SV%, +1.97 above expected); J. Greaves made 19 of 21 (0.905 SV%, +2.14 above expected). When Jakob Chychrun's snap shot from the top of the circles found the back of the net (P3, 15:53), it ended a game where neither team had executed.

Washington's rush offense proved the difference. The Capitals scored 2 goals on 25 rush chances, converting when it mattered most. Columbus couldn't match that pace. The Jackets created four rebound opportunities; Washington generated five. Neither team capitalized.

Columbus generated volume but lacked precision. Washington took fewer chances and capitalized. That's how road teams steal wins.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Apr 14
WSH
2
CBJ
1

Capitals hold off the Blue Jackets

Chances 4.1 – 3.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
4.14
CBJ
2.97
58% of the chances42%

The board read WSH 2, CBJ 1. The chances read WSH 4.1, CBJ 3.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
−2.1
goals above expected
WSH4.14 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
CBJ2.97 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Blue Jackets left 2.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 00:27CBJB. Jenner0–1
  2. P2 10:46WSHA. Beauvillier1–1
  3. P3 15:53WSHJ. ChychrunPP2–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
37 shots
2
Final
74 shots
CBJ
37 shots
1
WSH attackCBJ attack
WSH CBJ Goal
37
shots · 2 in
37
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHCBJ
0 / 8
2.24 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.01 xG
2 / 12
1.36 xG
Medium
1 / 11
1.36 xG
0 / 34
0.55 xG
Low
0 / 35
0.60 xG

The Blue Jackets went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Greaves
+2.1
CBJ · 19/21
A
C. Stevenson
+2.0
WSH · 27/28
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals hold off the Blue Jackets

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 4–11no goals
    2ndshots 6–9
    1. 00:27CBJB. Jenner(M. Marchment, D. Heinen)0–1
    2. 10:46WSHA. Beauvillier(T. van Riemsdyk)1–1
    3rdshots 11–8
    1. 15:53WSHJ. Chychrunpower play(T. Wilson, A. Ovechkin)2–1

    score reads WSH–CBJ

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    4.14
    WSH chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −2.1
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.017
    WSH puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    51.4%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.14Expected goals2.97
    WSH 58% of the chance quality
    21Shots on goal28
    8High-danger chances5
    54All attempts (Corsi)51
    Adjusted for score: WSH 52% · CBJ 48%
    Faceoffs · CBJ won44%off62%neu38%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    WSH0 / 8 · 2.24 xG
    CBJ0 / 5 · 1.01 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    WSH2 / 12 · 1.36 xG
    CBJ1 / 11 · 1.36 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    WSH0 / 34 · 0.55 xG
    CBJ0 / 35 · 0.60 xG

    WSH went 0-for-8 from high danger on 2.24 expected goals — 2.2 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    WSH
    2 G · 4.14 xG · -2.1
    CBJ
    1 G · 2.97 xG · -2.0
    012345

    WSH finished -2.1 against expected, CBJ -2.0.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    WSH
    SNAP1/17
    WRIST1/9
    SLAP0/3
    TIP IN0/5
    BACKHAND0/3
    DEFLECTED0/0
    BAT0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/17
    CBJ
    SNAP1/14
    WRIST0/9
    SLAP0/8
    TIP IN0/1
    BACKHAND0/2
    DEFLECTED0/1
    BAT0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER0/14
    WSH
    CBJ
    Off the rush
    2 G on 25
    2.35 xG
    1 G on 23
    1.90 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 5
    0.62 xG
    0 G on 4
    0.65 xG

    Snap shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-17, CBJ 1-for-14. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    C. Stevenson
    WSH · 27/28 · .964
    +2.0
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/51.0+1.0
    Medium1/111.4+0.4
    Low0/350.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Greaves
    CBJ · 19/21 · .905
    +2.1
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/82.2+2.2
    Medium2/121.4-0.6
    Low0/340.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    74 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    WSH
    37 shots
    2
    Final
    74 shots
    CBJ
    37 shots
    1
    WSH attackCBJ attack
    WSH CBJ Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, CBJ right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    J. Chychrun
    #6 · D · WSH
    1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 23:05 on ice
    T. van Riemsdyk
    #57 · D · WSH
    0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 20:03 on ice
    A. Ovechkin
    #8 · L · WSH
    0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:48 on ice · -1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Tue, Apr 14
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 11:40 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a WSH 2.5 - 2.8 goal game with the Blue Jackets at 54% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

    Washington is the hotter team, riding a 7-3-0 stretch over their last 10. Columbus has struggled in the same span, sitting at -13 goal differential. But the season-long underlying numbers suggest this isn't a blowout waiting to happen. Washington's 5v5 expected goals share sits at 50.0% to Columbus's 52.0%; the Corsi gap is similarly tight at 49.0% versus 51.0%.

    Washington's PDO of 1.018 signals some regression risk—they're running hot relative to underlying shot quality. Columbus sits at 1.003, closer to true talent.

    Alex Ovechkin remains Washington's focal point, posting 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 17 assists, buoyed by a 13.8% shooting rate and 2 high-danger goals. Anthony Beauvillier operates in similar territory with 0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, and 9 assists, though his 10.4% shooting rate has room to rise.

    Boone Jenner is Columbus's engine: 0.98 xG/60, 11 goals, 21 assists, and 2 high-danger goals at 9.6% conversion. Mathieu Olivier, who carried 0.89 xG/60 with 12 goals and 13.3% shooting, is likely out—he hasn't played in 16 days.

    Washington's Declan Chisholm and Columbus's Conor Garland will be tested. Neither team generates much from high-danger areas or rebounds (both at 0%).

    Ovechkin's workload is the single largest edge—0.97 xG/60 and 19 goals represent elite output. If Columbus can limit his impact, they remain competitive. If not, Washington's PDO regression won't matter. The Olivier absence thins Columbus's depth further.

    Yet that underlying edge in expected goals and possession for Columbus persists. Washington's hot streak is genuine; Columbus's slump reads more like variance than weakness. Which is why the odds make sense: Washington's hot streak against Columbus's underlying edge.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    CBJ 54%
    54%
    CBJ
    Model favorite
    46%
    54%
    WSH50CBJ

    CBJ by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.5–2.8 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    WSH← edge
    edge →CBJ
    50.0%52.0%
    49.0%51.0%
    2.622.63
    2.622.43
    2.182.12
    1.791.98
    1.0181.003

    CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.003) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    WSH
    7-3-0
    +6 GD · 2d rest
    CBJ
    2-7-1
    -13 GD · 2d rest
    1.018
    WSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.003
    CBJ PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Regression watch
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Capitals are the hotter team by points pace (7-3-0 in their last 10).
    • The Blue Jackets are underwater at -13 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    WSH
    Expected in goal
    L. Thompson
    2 days rest1.000 last start
    Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    CBJ
    Expected in goal
    J. Greaves
    2 days rest.864 last start
    Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    WSH
    Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
    0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
    Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
    0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
    CBJ
    Boone Jenner11G 21A
    0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
    Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
    0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next