Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · NYR at NJD · Preseason

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYR 2 · NJD 3
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 28, 3:24 PMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Devils beat the Rangers 3–2 in a game where the underlying numbers weren't close. New Jersey controlled 61% of expected goals (3.38–2.14), a margin that doesn't usually show up in two-goal games.

T. Meier led the way with a goal and an assist. The Devils scored all three goals off the rush — 3 on 36 chances is lethal finishing from dangerous ice. The Rangers gave up 36 rush shots worth 3.21 expected goals, meaning New Jersey turned transition control into every goal that mattered.

New York answered with two goals from low-danger spots. A. Blidh's 46-foot shot and D. Fortescue's goal were the kind of chances where the opposing goalie should have stopped both. That's the story of the Rangers' night: bleeding transition chances while converting luck.

N. Hischier opened the scoring in the second off the rush. T. Meier followed 1 second after forcing a turnover with his own score. J. Hughes closed it at 17:48 of the third, his assist credited to J. Bratt and B. Pesce.

The Devils held 63% of shot attempts (31–18), a discrepancy built entirely on the rush. D. Garand faced 31 shots and stopped 28 (0.903 save percentage); N. Daws came in relief and stopped 13 of 15 (0.867). Both marks reflect a workload shaped by New Jersey's relentless attack.

For the Devils, this was a masterclass in rush dominance. For the Rangers, transition defense failed every period, and it showed up on the scoreboard.

The goals

  • NJD 0–1, 11:55 of the second. N. Hischier, wrist shot from 21 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Garand. Assists: T. Meier, L. Evangelista. Win probability moved 21 points.
  • NYR 1–1, 16:05 of the second. A. Blidh, wrist shot from 46 feet, a 2% chance by the model (off the rush), past N. Daws. Assists: L. Greentree, D. Cholowski. Win probability moved 23 points.
  • NJD 1–2, 19:10 of the second. T. Meier, wraparound from 5 feet, an 8% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Garand. 1 second after a NJD takeaway by T. Meier. Win probability moved 24 points.
  • NYR 2–2, 07:07 of the third. D. Fortescue, wrist shot from 39 feet, a 4% chance by the model, past N. Daws. Assists: J. Parssinen, B. Lamb. 4 seconds after a NYR missed shot by J. Parssinen. Win probability moved 29 points.
  • NJD 2–3, 17:48 of the third. J. Hughes, wrist shot from 7 feet, a 19% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Garand. Assists: J. Bratt, B. Pesce. Win probability moved 41 points.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Preseason · Sep 21
NYR
2
NJD
3

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 2.1 – 3.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Devils earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
2.14
NJD
3.38
39% of the chances61%

The board read NYR 2, NJD 3. The chances read NYR 2.1, NJD 3.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
−0.4
goals above expected
NJD3.38 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR2.14 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+41
win-probability points
52% → 93% for NJD
NJD 100%the game, start to finish
NYR 100%P1 · P2 · P3
NJDP3 17:48

J. Hughes makes it 2–3.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 11:55NJDN. Hischier14%0–1
  2. P2 16:05NYRA. Blidh2%1–1
  3. P2 19:10NJDT. Meier8%1–2
  4. P3 07:07NYRD. Fortescue4%2–2
  5. P3 17:48NJDJ. Hughes19%2–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
32 shots
2
Final
81 shots
NJD
49 shots
3
NYR attackNJD attack
NYR NJD Goal
32
shots · 2 in
49
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRNJD
0 / 2
0.41 xG
High danger
1 / 3
0.58 xG
0 / 13
1.38 xG
Medium
2 / 20
2.23 xG
2 / 29
0.34 xG
Low
0 / 42
0.57 xG

High-danger looks: NYR 0 of 2, NJD 1 of 3.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B
D. Garand
+0.4
NYR · 28/31 · 58:37
Best save · a 20% chance, snap from 19 ft · P3 07:49
B
J. Allen
+0.3
NJD · 3/3 · 19:51
Best save · a 14% chance, wrist from 14 ft · P1 15:47
+1 more on the full breakdown
Best skater on the ice
A+
NJD
T. Meier
R · impact 1.81
16:49
Ice time
1–1
G – A
0.34
Own xG
48%
xG share
Impact · top 4
T. Meier1.8A+
J. Hughes1.8A+
N. Hischier1.4A+
J. Bratt1.4A
Report card
NYRNJD
OffenseC-A-
DefenseD-B-
TransitionFA+
Special teamsFF
GoaltendingC+C
DisciplineCC
LuckC+C
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why NJD won
  1. 01Dangerous off the rush
  2. 02Won on the merits
  3. 03T. Meier led the way
Why NYR lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Allowed 3.38 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 3 high-danger shots (0.58 xG) and 36 rush shots (3.21 xG).
  3. 03Rush shots 20–36, rush xG 1.65–3.21 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 3–10no goals
    2ndshots 9–13
    1. 11:55NJDN. Hischier(T. Meier, L. Evangelista)0–1

      Wrist shot from 21 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past D. Garand. Win probability moved 21 points.On the ice: D. Hamilton, A. Mantha, J. Siegenthaler, J. Bratt, J. Hughes · against A. Blidh, G. Gawdin, S. Morrow, D. Fortescue, L. Greentree

    2. 16:05NYRA. Blidh(L. Greentree, D. Cholowski)1–1

      Wrist shot from 46 feet, a 2% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past N. Daws. Win probability moved 23 points.On the ice: J. Dowling, U. Vaakanainen, B. Lamb, D. Fortescue, N. Aspinall · against B. Pesce, A. Mantha, J. Bratt, J. Hughes, L. Hughes

    3. 19:10NJDT. Meier1–2

      Wraparound from 5 feet, an 8% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past D. Garand. 1s after a NJD takeaway by T. Meier. Win probability moved 24 points.On the ice: B. Pesce, T. Meier, N. Hischier, L. Evangelista, L. Hughes · against A. Blidh, G. Gawdin, U. Vaakanainen, D. Fortescue, L. Greentree

    3rdshots 6–8
    1. 07:07NYRD. Fortescue(J. Parssinen, B. Lamb)2–2

      Wrist shot from 39 feet, a 4% chance, a shot that rarely goes in, past N. Daws. 4s after a NYR miss by J. Parssinen. Win probability moved 29 points.On the ice: A. Blidh, G. Gawdin, D. Cholowski, D. Fortescue, L. Greentree · against A. Mantha, J. Bratt, J. Hughes, T. Vilen, M. Diotte

    2. 17:48NJDJ. Hughes(J. Bratt, B. Pesce)2–3

      Wrist shot from 7 feet, a 19% chance (off the rush), past D. Garand. Win probability moved 41 points.On the ice: B. Pesce, E. Rodrigues, A. Gritsyuk, D. Mercer, L. Hughes · against D. Cholowski, U. Vaakanainen, M. Rempe, C. Terrance, J. Battaglia

    score reads NYR–NJD

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.38
    NJD chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.4
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.001
    NJD puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    59.6%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.14Expected goals3.38
    NJD 61% of the chance quality
    18Shots on goal31
    2High-danger chances3
    44All attempts (Corsi)65
    Adjusted for score: NYR 41% · NJD 59%
    Faceoffs · NJD won50%off36%neu36%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYR0 / 2 · 0.41 xG
    NJD1 / 3 · 0.58 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYR0 / 13 · 1.38 xG
    NJD2 / 20 · 2.23 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYR2 / 29 · 0.34 xG
    NJD0 / 42 · 0.57 xG

    NYR went 2-for-29 from low danger on 0.34 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYR
    2 G · 2.14 xG · -0.1
    NJD
    3 G · 3.38 xG · -0.4
    01234

    NYR finished -0.1 against expected, NJD -0.4.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYR
    WRIST2/20
    SNAP0/5
    TIP IN0/3
    SLAP0/2
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    OTHER0/12
    NJD
    WRIST2/25
    SNAP0/7
    TIP IN0/8
    SLAP0/7
    WRAP AROUND1/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    OTHER0/16
    NYR
    NJD
    Off the rush
    1 G on 20
    1.65 xG
    3 G on 36
    3.21 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 1
    0.14 xG
    0 G on 2
    0.02 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 2-for-20, NJD 2-for-25. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    D. Garand
    NYR · 28/31 · .903
    started · 58:37 · loss
    +0.4
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    Attempts faced
    49
    Avg chance faced
    6.9%
    Stopped vs expected
    0.939 vs 0.931
    Rebounds allowed
    2
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/30.6-0.4
    Medium2/202.2+0.2
    Low0/260.6+0.6
    Shorthanded0/30.3+0.3
    Tips & deflections0/80.6+0.6
    The save
    20% chance stopped, a snap from 19 ft · P3 07:49
    The one to have back
    8% chance went in, a wrap-around from 5 ft · P2 19:10

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Allen
    NJD · 3/3 · 1.000
    started · 19:51
    +0.3
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    Attempts faced
    6
    Avg chance faced
    5.2%
    Stopped vs expected
    1.000 vs 0.948
    Rebounds allowed
    0
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    Medium0/30.3+0.3
    Low0/30.0+0.0
    Tips & deflections0/10.1+0.1
    The save
    14% chance stopped, a wrist from 14 ft · P1 15:47

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    N. Daws
    NJD · 13/15 · .867
    in relief · 40:00 · win
    -0.2
    saved above expected
    C
    the night
    Attempts faced
    26
    Avg chance faced
    7.0%
    Stopped vs expected
    0.923 vs 0.930
    Rebounds allowed
    1
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/20.4+0.4
    Medium0/101.1+1.1
    Low2/140.3-1.7
    Shorthanded0/10.0+0.0
    Tips & deflections0/20.2+0.2
    The save
    22% chance stopped, a snap from 19 ft · P2 04:37
    The one to have back
    2% chance went in, a wrist from 46 ft · P2 16:05

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    Every skater who dressed

    Who played

    Rated on what they produced and how fast

    Best skater on the ice by our rating: T. Meier (NJD), 16:49 of ice, 1-1, 48% of the expected goals while he was out.

    NYR18 skaters
    SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
    J. ParssinenC16:300-153A
    L. GreentreeR19:060-133B
    D. FortescueD20:411-037B
    A. BlidhL17:451-030B
    B. LambR18:220-143B
    S. MorrowD22:440-054C
    J. DowlingC18:340-060C
    M. RobertsonD20:570-050C
    N. AspinallL14:340-044C
    A. SykoraL2:490-019C
    C. TerranceC9:290-055D
    J. BattagliaR12:220-047D
    D. CholowskiD19:360-120D
    V. IorioD11:520-043F
    G. GawdinC19:230-027F
    M. RempeC15:190-034F
    U. VaakanainenD21:160-027F
    D. RoobroeckC18:040-018F
    NJD18 skaters
    SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
    T. MeierR16:491-148A+
    J. HughesC18:201-078A+
    N. HischierC16:571-065A+
    J. BrattL16:380-176A
    B. PesceD19:450-171A
    L. HughesD22:220-074A
    L. EvangelistaR18:350-159A
    D. MercerC13:380-058B
    A. ManthaR15:330-075B
    J. BoqvistC11:500-061B
    S. NoesenR11:530-046C
    D. HamiltonD21:560-054C
    A. GritsyukR12:490-050C
    E. RodriguesC13:240-049D
    M. DiotteD17:060-049D
    T. VilenD15:530-055D
    J. SiegenthalerD21:110-052D
    M. McLaughlinC13:300-052D

    xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

    Scratched, NYR: M. Zibanejad, J. Miller, J. Korpisalo, O. Bjorkstrand, S. Martin, M. Pettersson and 45 more. Scratched, NJD: B. Dillon, N. Bjugstad, C. Brown, C. White, R. Tufte, D. Rittich and 44 more. Referees Chris Rooney and Alexander Lepkowski; linesmen Jeremy Faucher and Daniel Kelly.

    Graded against a league-average game

    Report card

    Seven dimensions · A+ to F
    DimensionNYRNJD
    Offense
    ▸Basis

    NYR Created 2.14 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 2 high-danger shots (0.41 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.65 xG).

    NJD Created 3.38 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 3 high-danger shots (0.58 xG) and 36 rush shots (3.21 xG).

    C-
    70
    A-
    90
    Defense
    ▸Basis

    NYR Allowed 3.38 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 3 high-danger shots (0.58 xG) and 36 rush shots (3.21 xG).

    NJD Allowed 2.14 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 2 high-danger shots (0.41 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.65 xG).

    D-
    60
    B-
    80
    Transition
    ▸Basis

    NYR Rush shots 20–36, rush xG 1.65–3.21 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

    NJD Rush shots 36–20, rush xG 3.21–1.65 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

    F
    51
    A+
    99
    Special teams
    ▸Basis

    NYR 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.00 PP xG.

    NJD 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.25 PP xG.

    F
    48
    F
    58
    Goaltending
    ▸Basis

    NYR +0.38 goals saved above expected on 31 shots against.

    NJD +0.14 goals saved above expected on 18 shots against.

    C+
    79
    C
    76
    Discipline
    ▸Basis

    NYR Took 1 penalties for 2 PIM vs 1 for 2 on the other side.

    NJD Took 1 penalties for 2 PIM vs 1 for 2 on the other side.

    C
    75
    C
    75
    Luck

    Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

    ▸Basis

    NYR Finishing -0.14 goals vs xG plus +0.38 GSAx of save luck = +0.24 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

    NJD Finishing -0.38 goals vs xG plus +0.14 GSAx of save luck = -0.24 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

    C+
    77
    C
    73
    Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
    What the model flagged
    WARNINGNYR

    Rush defense leaked all night

    Gave up 36 rush shots worth 3.21 xG (3 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

    Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

    STRENGTHNJD

    Dangerous off the rush

    3 goals on 36 rush shots worth 3.21 xG.

    WARNINGNJD

    Rush defense leaked all night

    Gave up 20 rush shots worth 1.65 xG (1 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

    Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

    STRENGTHNYR

    Dangerous off the rush

    1 goals on 20 rush shots worth 1.65 xG.

    STRENGTHNJD

    Won on the merits

    The Devils controlled 61% of expected goals (3.38–2.14) and won 3-2 — result matched process.

    TACTICALNJD

    The moment it turned

    Jack Hughes's wrist shot from the doorstep in P3 swung the game.

    81 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYR
    32 shots
    2
    Final
    81 shots
    NJD
    49 shots
    3
    NYR attackNJD attack
    NYR NJD Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    T. Meier
    #28 · R · NJD
    1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 16:49 on ice · +1
    D. Fortescue
    #45 · D · NYR
    1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 20:41 on ice
    B. Pesce
    #22 · D · NJD
    0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 19:45 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Mon, Sep 21
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    Preseason · exhibition

    Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The rates below are last season's; this exhibition will not count toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

    ◆ By the ModelSep 22, 3:13 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 3.0–3.3 goal game between the Rangers and Devils, with New Jersey at 56% win probability. Behind that lean lies a clear edge in underlying play: the Devils own 5v5 possession at 50.7% xG versus New York's 47.5%, and their Corsi split (51.3% to 48.6%) reinforces it.

    But there's a correction coming. New Jersey's PDO sits at 0.971—running cold—while New York's is 1.009. The Devils are due for positive regression, meaning their actual performance will climb closer to what they've earned in play.

    Jacob Markstrom is the Rangers' exposed flank. His -16.2 GSAx across 44 games means he's consistently surrendering high-danger chances above expectation. Timo Meier (1.08 xG/60, 13 goals, 3 high-danger goals) will press that weakness. Adam Sykora carries the Rangers' most dangerous tools—0.91 xG/60 and 3 goals—though he has generated 0 high-danger goals.

    Gabe Perreault has been an efficient offensive weapon for New York: 0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 11 assists, and 2 high-danger goals on 13.1% shooting. Jack Hughes anchors New Jersey's attack with 0.88 xG/60, 18 goals, and 17 assists, but only 1 high-danger goal.

    The model favors the Devils because they control play. Whether that control converts before regression tightens the score—before luck regresses toward talent—is the game within the game.

    Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NJD 56%
    56%
    NJD
    Model favorite
    44%
    56%
    NYR50NJD

    NJD by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 3.0–3.3 NJD; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYR← edge
    edge →NJD
    47.5%50.7%
    48.6%51.3%
    2.873.16
    3.183.07
    2.872.76
    3.043.09
    1.0090.971

    NJD holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 0.971) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 0–1
    NYR
    0-0-0
    +0 GD · 0d rest
    NJD
    1-0-0
    +1 GD · 1d rest
    1.009
    NYR PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.971
    NJD PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    WARNINGNJD

    D. Rittich on a back-to-back

    D. Rittich projects to start on 1 day of rest — watch for a backup start or tired legs.

    Test the goalie early with traffic and second-chance pressure.

    WARNINGNJD

    Jacob Markstrom has leaked goals all season

    Jacob Markstrom: -16.2 GSAx over 44 games.

    Shoot from everywhere — volume beats a cold crease.

    TACTICALNJD

    Shutdown Assignment: Devils

    Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)

    Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)

    TACTICALNYR

    Shutdown Assignment: Rangers

    Key matchup: Neutralize Timo Meier (13G, 1.08 xG/60, 3 HD goals)

    Key matchup: Neutralize Timo Meier (13G, 1.08 xG/60, 3 HD goals)

    Where the edges live
    • The Devils own the underlying play — 50.7% 5v5 xG vs 47.5%.
    Regression watch
    • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Devils own the underlying play — 50.7% 5v5 xG vs 47.5%.
    • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYR
    Expected in goal
    —
    no game on file

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NJD
    Expected in goal
    D. Rittich
    back-to-back.958 last start
    Backup Jacob Markstrom · -16.2 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYR
    Adam Sykora3G 1A
    0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
    Gabe Perreault8G 11A
    0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
    NJD
    Timo Meier13G 15A
    1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
    Jack Hughes18G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next