Motion-blurred skater in a green sweater
Breakdown · DAL at MIN · Preseason

Stars hold off the Wild

The verdict · stolen

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.18–2.94 and won anyway.

DAL 2 · MIN 1
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 26, 1:28 PMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Dallas edged Minnesota 2–1 in a game that belonged to the Wild by almost every measure except the scoreboard. The Stars played a heist: they controlled play from behind and turned a hopeless night into a win on the strength of their goaltending and a pair of devastating rush goals.

Minnesota owned this game's foundation. The Wild held 60% of shot attempts and controlled 57% of expected goals, which means Dallas had no right to be holding the lead down the stretch. But C. DeSmith transformed the math. He made 26 saves and stopped 1.94 goals above what the expected-goals model thought he should allow—a goaltender stealing a win by himself.

The Wild's problem was not a shortage of chances: they generated 2.94 expected goals, created three high-danger scoring chances, and played transition defense that leaked rush opportunities all night. They simply could not find the finish. J. Wallstedt faced the moment differently—16 saves on 18 shots, and Minnesota's expected output outpaced what landed in the net by 1.94 goals.

Dallas built its victory on efficiency. R. Faksa struck first from 44 feet on the rush (a 3% chance), and T. Harley's wrist shot from 49 feet (a 1% chance) ended it. Two goals from the kind of dangerous distance that goalies are supposed to stop; that was the game.

The goals

  • DAL 1–0, 09:18 of the first. R. Faksa, wrist shot from 44 feet, a 3% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Wallstedt. Assists: O. Bäck, J. Kiviranta. J. Brodin was 67 seconds into his shift for the defending side. Win probability moved 16 points.
  • MIN 1–1, 01:54 of the second. J. Eriksson Ek, wrist shot from 4 feet, a 41% chance by the model, past C. DeSmith. Assists: B. Coleman, M. Boldy. 4 seconds after a MIN blocked shot by N. Lundkvist. Win probability moved 19 points.
  • DAL 2–1, 18:38 of the second. T. Harley, wrist shot from 49 feet, a 1% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Wallstedt. Assists: M. Rantanen, J. Benn. Win probability moved 26 points.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Preseason · Sep 25
DAL
2
MIN
1

Stars hold off the Wild

Chances 2.2 – 2.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Wild deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
DAL
2.18
MIN
2.94
43% of the chances57%

The board read DAL 2, MIN 1. The chances read DAL 2.2, MIN 2.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DAL
−0.2
goals above expected
DAL2.18 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
MIN2.94 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Wild left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+26
win-probability points
47% → 73% for DAL
MIN 100%the game, start to finish
DAL 100%P1 · P2 · P3
DALP2 18:38

T. Harley makes it 2–1.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 09:18DALR. Faksa3%1–0
  2. P2 01:54MINJ. Eriksson Ek41%1–1
  3. P2 18:38DALT. Harley1%2–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
DAL
27 shots
2
Final
62 shots
MIN
35 shots
1
DAL attackMIN attack
DAL MIN Goal
27
shots · 2 in
35
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
DALMIN
0 / 1
0.20 xG
High danger
1 / 3
0.82 xG
0 / 15
1.69 xG
Medium
0 / 15
1.68 xG
2 / 29
0.29 xG
Low
0 / 31
0.44 xG

High-danger looks: DAL 0 of 1, MIN 1 of 3.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
C. DeSmith
+1.9
DAL · 26/27 · 60:00
Best save · a 22% chance, snap from 20 ft · P2 19:40
C
J. Wallstedt
+0.2
MIN · 16/18 · 58:05
Best save · a 20% chance, wrist from 13 ft · P3 11:13
Best skater on the ice
A+
DAL
T. Harley
D · impact 1.28
21:56
Ice time
1–0
G – A
0.14
Own xG
65%
xG share
Impact · top 4
T. Harley1.3A+
M. Rantanen1.1A+
B. Coleman1.0A+
M. Shabanov0.9A
Report card
DALMIN
OffenseC-B-
DefenseD+B-
TransitionD+B-
Special teamsFF
GoaltendingAC+
DisciplineCC
LuckB+D-
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why DAL won
  1. 01Won against the run of play
  2. 02Dangerous off the rush
  3. 03C. DeSmith tilted the crease
Why MIN lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Cold finishing night
  3. 03Deserved a better fate
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Stars hold off the Wild

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–7
  1. 09:18DALR. Faksa(O. Bäck, J. Kiviranta)1–0

    Wrist shot from 44 feet, a 3% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past J. Wallstedt. J. Brodin was 67s into his shift for the defending side. Win probability moved 16 points.On the ice: T. Myers, M. Rantanen, W. Johnston, L. Bichsel, J. Hryckowian · against J. Spurgeon, J. Brodin, K. Kaprizov, D. Yurov, M. Shabanov

2ndshots 9–7
  1. 01:54MINJ. Eriksson Ek(B. Coleman, M. Boldy)1–1

    Wrist shot from 4 feet, a 41% chance, past C. DeSmith. 4s after a MIN block. Win probability moved 19 points.On the ice: Z. Bogosian, O. Maatta, K. Kaprizov, D. Yurov, M. Shabanov · against J. Benn, T. Myers, S. Steel, L. Bichsel, A. Hyry

  2. 18:38DALT. Harley(M. Rantanen, J. Benn)2–1

    Wrist shot from 49 feet, a 1% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past J. Wallstedt. Win probability moved 26 points.On the ice: R. Faksa, E. Lindell, O. Bäck, N. Lundkvist, J. Kiviranta · against J. Eriksson Ek, K. Kaprizov, Q. Hughes, B. Faber, M. Shabanov

3rdshots 2–13no goals

    score reads DAL–MIN

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.18
    DAL chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.2
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.024
    DAL puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    47.9%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.18Expected goals2.94
    MIN 57% of the chance quality
    18Shots on goal27
    1High-danger chances3
    45All attempts (Corsi)49
    Adjusted for score: DAL 46% · MIN 54%
    Faceoffs · MIN won47%off41%neu50%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    DAL0 / 1 · 0.20 xG
    MIN1 / 3 · 0.82 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    DAL0 / 15 · 1.69 xG
    MIN0 / 15 · 1.68 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    DAL2 / 29 · 0.29 xG
    MIN0 / 31 · 0.44 xG

    DAL went 2-for-29 from low danger on 0.29 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    DAL
    2 G · 2.18 xG · -0.2
    MIN
    1 G · 2.94 xG · -1.9
    01234

    DAL finished -0.2 against expected, MIN -1.9.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    DAL
    WRIST2/21
    SNAP0/3
    TIP IN0/1
    SLAP0/1
    DEFLECTED0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    BACKHAND0/0
    OTHER0/18
    MIN
    WRIST1/20
    SNAP0/5
    TIP IN0/4
    SLAP0/3
    DEFLECTED0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    OTHER0/14
    DAL
    MIN
    Off the rush
    2 G on 21
    1.75 xG
    0 G on 24
    2.22 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 3
    0.37 xG
    0 G on 2
    0.20 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 2-for-21, MIN 1-for-20. DAL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    C. DeSmith
    DAL · 26/27 · .963
    started · 60:00 · win
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    Attempts faced
    35
    Avg chance faced
    8.4%
    Stopped vs expected
    0.971 vs 0.916
    Rebounds allowed
    2
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/30.8-0.2
    Medium0/151.7+1.7
    Low0/170.4+0.4
    Shorthanded0/50.4+0.4
    Tips & deflections0/50.4+0.4
    The save
    22% chance stopped, a snap from 20 ft · P2 19:40
    The one to have back
    41% chance went in, a wrist from 4 ft · P2 01:54

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Wallstedt
    MIN · 16/18 · .889
    started · 58:05 · loss
    +0.2
    saved above expected
    C
    the night
    Attempts faced
    27
    Avg chance faced
    8.1%
    Stopped vs expected
    0.926 vs 0.919
    Rebounds allowed
    3
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/10.2+0.2
    Medium0/151.7+1.7
    Low2/110.3-1.7
    Shorthanded0/40.4+0.4
    Tips & deflections0/20.1+0.1
    The save
    20% chance stopped, a wrist from 13 ft · P3 11:13
    The one to have back
    1% chance went in, a wrist from 49 ft · P2 18:38

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    Every skater who dressed

    Who played

    Rated on what they produced and how fast

    Best skater on the ice by our rating: T. Harley (DAL), 21:56 of ice, 1-0, 65% of the expected goals while he was out.

    DAL18 skaters
    SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
    T. HarleyD21:561-065A+
    M. RantanenR20:350-175A+
    R. FaksaC11:571-029A
    J. KivirantaL10:540-145A
    W. JohnstonC20:390-082B
    M. HeiskanenD25:350-071B
    O. BäckC11:390-113C
    R. HintzC17:500-048C
    J. RobertsonL19:290-056C
    J. BennL12:410-121C
    N. LundkvistD16:590-045D
    S. SteelC12:590-036D
    E. LindellD19:090-043D
    J. HryckowianC15:030-074D
    T. SeguinC13:570-030F
    A. HyryR11:470-025F
    L. BichselD14:230-018F
    T. MyersD14:490-015F
    MIN18 skaters
    SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
    B. ColemanL17:140-151A+
    M. ShabanovR14:140-082A
    D. YurovR12:330-086A
    K. KaprizovL17:240-072A
    B. BrinkR13:280-084B
    J. Eriksson EkC19:191-029B
    M. BoldyL20:540-129B
    R. HartmanR16:370-074B
    O. MaattaD20:160-078B
    Q. HughesD23:440-063C
    Z. BogosianD16:100-085C
    J. SpurgeonD19:340-045C
    Y. TreninC12:360-071C
    B. FaberD14:270-062D
    N. FolignoL12:030-042D
    M. FolignoL10:490-039D
    M. McCarronC12:390-039D
    J. BrodinD19:540-037F

    xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

    Scratched, DAL: M. Duchene, C. McKenzie, M. Sgarbossa, C. Blackwell, K. Capobianco, C. Hughes and 23 more. Scratched, MIN: C. Pickard, F. Gustavsson, N. Sturm, M. Koster, M. Guskov, D. Hunt and 17 more. Referees Corey Syvret and Liam Maaskant; linesmen Chris Martenet and Tyson Baker.

    Graded against a league-average game

    Report card

    Seven dimensions · A+ to F
    DimensionDALMIN
    Offense
    ▸Basis

    DAL Created 2.18 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 1 high-danger shots (0.20 xG) and 21 rush shots (1.75 xG).

    MIN Created 2.94 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 3 high-danger shots (0.82 xG) and 24 rush shots (2.22 xG).

    C-
    70
    B-
    82
    Defense
    ▸Basis

    DAL Allowed 2.94 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 3 high-danger shots (0.82 xG) and 24 rush shots (2.22 xG).

    MIN Allowed 2.18 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 1 high-danger shots (0.20 xG) and 21 rush shots (1.75 xG).

    D+
    68
    B-
    80
    Transition
    ▸Basis

    DAL Rush shots 21–24, rush xG 1.75–2.22 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

    MIN Rush shots 24–21, rush xG 2.22–1.75 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

    D+
    69
    B-
    81
    Special teams
    ▸Basis

    DAL 0-for-4 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.37 PP xG.

    MIN 0-for-4 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.36 PP xG.

    F
    52
    F
    52
    Goaltending
    ▸Basis

    DAL +1.94 goals saved above expected on 27 shots against.

    MIN +0.18 goals saved above expected on 18 shots against.

    A
    94
    C+
    77
    Discipline
    ▸Basis

    DAL Took 9 penalties for 43 PIM vs 9 for 43 on the other side.

    MIN Took 9 penalties for 43 PIM vs 9 for 43 on the other side.

    C
    75
    C
    75
    Luck

    Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

    ▸Basis

    DAL Finishing -0.18 goals vs xG plus +1.94 GSAx of save luck = +1.76 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

    MIN Finishing -1.94 goals vs xG plus +0.18 GSAx of save luck = -1.76 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

    B+
    89
    D-
    61
    Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
    What the model flagged
    WARNINGMIN

    Rush defense leaked all night

    Gave up 21 rush shots worth 1.75 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

    Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

    SURPRISEDAL

    Won against the run of play

    The Stars took it 2-1 with only 43% of expected goals (2.18–2.94).

    STRENGTHDAL

    Dangerous off the rush

    2 goals on 21 rush shots worth 1.75 xG.

    LUCKMIN

    Cold finishing night

    Scored 1 on 2.94 xG — -1.94 vs expected. The looks were there; the finish will come back.

    WARNINGDAL

    Rush defense leaked all night

    Gave up 24 rush shots worth 2.22 xG (0 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

    Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

    STRENGTHDAL

    C. DeSmith tilted the crease

    C. DeSmith stopped 26 of 27 (0.963), +1.94 goals above expected.

    62 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    DAL
    27 shots
    2
    Final
    62 shots
    MIN
    35 shots
    1
    DAL attackMIN attack
    DAL MIN Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — DAL left, MIN right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    T. Harley
    #55 · D · DAL
    1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 21:56 on ice · +1
    M. Boldy
    #12 · L · MIN
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:54 on ice · +1
    M. Rantanen
    #96 · R · DAL
    0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 20:35 on ice · -1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    Keep going

    Where to next