S. Varlamov couldn't make the stop
S. Varlamov allowed 6 on 27 shots (0.778) — 2.85 goals worse than expected.
Reassess the crease rotation before the next start.

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.
The Rangers demolished the Islanders 6-1. They controlled the game from the first shift and finished with ruthless efficiency, scoring on the rush and the power play.
New York scored 2.85 more goals than the underlying play suggested they would—an unusually wide margin. Rangers produced 3.15 expected goals at 5v5 while holding the Islanders to 1.94, a 62-38 split. S. Varlamov saved 21 of 27 shots but finished nearly 3 goals worse than expected. I. Shesterkin made 15 saves on 16 and finished nearly 1 goal better than expected.
The Rangers were lethal on the rush. O. Bjorkstrand opened the scoring with a wrist shot from 9 feet. J. Miller made it 2–0 on the power play with a snap shot from 10 feet. T. Kartye, G. Perreault, and M. Zibanejad all capitalized on transition chances. W. Cuylle converted a rebound.
New York's power play was dominant—2 goals on 8 shots. The Islanders held just 37% of shot attempts (16 to 27) and scored once, on P. Engvall's snap shot at 11:22 of the third, a 6% chance from 34 feet.
Dominance in every direction.
What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.
Rangers run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Rangers earned this one.
The board read NYR 6, NYI 1. The chances read NYR 3.1, NYI 1.9.
The Rangers scored 2.9 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.
O. Bjorkstrand makes it 1–0.
The Islanders went 0 for 6 from the slot.
Rangers run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers
A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.
Read the full breakdownWrist shot from 9 feet, a 19% chance, past S. Varlamov. 8s after a NYR shot by O. Bjorkstrand. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: E. Tolvanen, B. Schneider, W. Cuylle, N. Laba, A. Smits · against L. Foudy, M. Chaffee, M. Kessel, I. George, D. Prokhorov
Snap shot from 10 feet, a 19% chance, past S. Varlamov. Win probability moved 13 points.On the ice: V. Gavrikov, A. Fox, J. Veleno, T. Kartye, M. Rempe · against T. DeAngelo, M. Highmore, M. Luff, A. Jefferies, K. Aitcheson
Snap shot from 27 feet, a 4% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past S. Varlamov. Win probability moved 9 points.On the ice: M. Zibanejad, M. Pettersson, S. Durzi, A. Lafrenière, G. Perreault · against R. Pulock, M. Highmore, M. Luff, A. Jefferies, I. George
Tip-in from 15 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past S. Varlamov.On the ice: J. Miller, O. Bjorkstrand, V. Gavrikov, A. Fox, P. Dorofeyev · against T. DeAngelo, L. Foudy, D. Kuefler, K. Aitcheson, D. Prokhorov
Backhander from 6 feet, a 14% chance (a rebound), past S. Varlamov. 3s after a NYR shot by N. Laba.On the ice: M. Pettersson, E. Tolvanen, W. Cuylle, N. Laba, A. Smits · against T. DeAngelo, M. Highmore, M. Luff, A. Romanov, A. Jefferies
Wrist shot from 12 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past S. Varlamov.On the ice: M. Pettersson, E. Tolvanen, S. Durzi, W. Cuylle, N. Laba · against A. Duclair, T. DeAngelo, K. MacLean, E. Heineman, I. George
Snap shot from 34 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past I. Shesterkin.On the ice: P. Engvall, L. Foudy, M. Kessel, C. Eiserman, K. Aitcheson · against M. Pettersson, E. Tolvanen, S. Durzi, W. Cuylle, N. Laba
score reads NYR–NYI
NYR went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.72 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.
NYR finished +2.9 against expected, NYI -0.9.
Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 2-for-8, NYI 0-for-12. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.
The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
Best skater on the ice by our rating: A. Fox (NYR), 17:53 of ice, 0-3, 74% of the expected goals while he was out.
| Skater | TOI | G-A | SOG | ixG | xG% | PD/PT | Impact | /60 | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. FoxD | 17:53 | 0-3 | 2 | 0.18 | 74 | 0/0 | 2.68 | 8.98 | A+ |
| M. ZibanejadC | 14:57 | 1-1 | 1 | 0.33 | 48 | 0/0 | 1.72 | 6.89 | A+ |
| W. CuylleL | 14:44 | 1-0 | 3 | 0.41 | 72 | 1/0 | 1.62 | 6.61 | A+ |
| J. MillerC | 15:02 | 1-1 | 2 | 0.39 | 47 | 0/0 | 1.48 | 5.89 | A |
| N. LabaC | 14:29 | 0-1 | 2 | 0.16 | 94 | 0/1 | 1.32 | 5.48 | A |
| T. KartyeL | 17:02 | 1-0 | 2 | 0.05 | 94 | 1/0 | 1.34 | 4.72 | A |
| P. DorofeyevR | 16:04 | 0-2 | 2 | 0.38 | 47 | 0/1 | 1.30 | 4.87 | A |
| V. GavrikovD | 20:35 | 0-1 | 1 | 0.11 | 66 | 0/0 | 1.20 | 3.50 | A |
| O. BjorkstrandR | 13:05 | 1-0 | 4 | 0.33 | 42 | 0/0 | 1.01 | 4.65 | B |
| M. RempeC | 13:43 | 0-1 | 0 | 0.00 | 95 | 0/0 | 0.89 | 3.89 | B |
| G. PerreaultR | 12:51 | 1-0 | 1 | 0.13 | 41 | 0/0 | 0.76 | 3.54 | B |
| S. DurziD | 21:17 | 0-1 | 1 | 0.02 | 66 | 0/0 | 0.87 | 2.44 | B |
| M. PetterssonD | 22:14 | 0-1 | 0 | 0.00 | 70 | 0/0 | 0.87 | 2.35 | B |
| E. TolvanenR | 14:38 | 0-0 | 2 | 0.31 | 72 | 0/0 | 0.62 | 2.53 | C |
| J. VelenoC | 16:59 | 0-0 | 2 | 0.16 | 74 | 0/0 | 0.48 | 1.69 | C |
| A. LafrenièreL | 15:33 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.19 | 48 | 1/0 | 0.26 | 0.99 | C |
| A. SmitsD | 18:18 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.02 | 58 | 0/0 | 0.24 | 0.77 | C |
| B. SchneiderD | 16:42 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.00 | 40 | 3/2 | 0.09 | 0.30 | D |
| Skater | TOI | G-A | SOG | ixG | xG% | PD/PT | Impact | /60 | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. EngvallL | 19:07 | 1-0 | 2 | 0.08 | 59 | 0/0 | 1.02 | 3.20 | B |
| C. EisermanL | 15:07 | 0-1 | 1 | 0.03 | 53 | 0/0 | 0.80 | 3.19 | B |
| M. ChaffeeR | 14:54 | 0-0 | 2 | 0.42 | 68 | 0/1 | 0.41 | 1.67 | C |
| L. FoudyC | 17:29 | 0-1 | 0 | 0.00 | 30 | 1/0 | 0.32 | 1.10 | C |
| M. KesselD | 15:27 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.05 | 74 | 2/3 | 0.25 | 0.97 | C |
| A. DuclairL | 17:06 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.14 | 48 | 0/0 | 0.24 | 0.85 | C |
| K. MacLeanC | 17:13 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.22 | 49 | 0/0 | 0.23 | 0.79 | D |
| D. ProkhorovR | 14:16 | 0-0 | 3 | 0.33 | 34 | 0/0 | 0.07 | 0.29 | D |
| A. RomanovD | 20:24 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.01 | 35 | 0/0 | 0.04 | 0.11 | D |
| E. HeinemanL | 16:38 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.21 | 36 | 0/1 | -0.05 | -0.17 | D |
| I. GeorgeD | 17:32 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.10 | 37 | 0/0 | -0.14 | -0.46 | D |
| M. LuffR | 11:43 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.14 | 18 | 0/0 | -0.16 | -0.83 | D |
| T. DeAngeloD | 21:11 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.00 | 35 | 0/0 | -0.23 | -0.67 | D |
| M. HighmoreC | 9:41 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.20 | 27 | 0/0 | -0.21 | -1.31 | F |
| K. AitchesonD | 22:27 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.00 | 34 | 1/1 | -0.30 | -0.80 | F |
| A. JefferiesL | 10:58 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.00 | 18 | 0/0 | -0.32 | -1.75 | F |
| D. KueflerL | 15:03 | 0-0 | 1 | 0.01 | 10 | 0/0 | -0.39 | -1.56 | F |
| R. PulockD | 18:29 | 0-0 | 0 | 0.00 | 25 | 0/1 | -0.51 | -1.64 | F |
xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.
Scratched, NYR: A. Blidh, G. Gawdin, T. Raddysh, M. Robertson, M. Del Gaizo, D. Garand and 29 more. Scratched, NYI: K. Palmieri, B. Schenn, C. Cizikas, O. Palat, J. Pageau, S. Mayfield and 36 more. Referees Francois St-Laurent and Austin Rook; linesmen Shandor Alphonso and Anthony Lapointe.
NYR Created 3.15 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 6 high-danger shots (1.17 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.31 xG).
NYI Created 1.94 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 6 high-danger shots (1.25 xG) and 13 rush shots (1.55 xG).
NYR Allowed 1.94 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.25 xG) and 13 rush shots (1.55 xG).
NYI Allowed 3.15 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.17 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.31 xG).
NYR Rush shots 21–13, rush xG 2.31–1.55 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).
NYI Rush shots 13–21, rush xG 1.55–2.31 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).
NYR 2-for-4 on the power play (50%; league ≈21%) with 0.63 PP xG.
NYI 0-for-2 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.00 PP xG.
NYR +0.94 goals saved above expected on 16 shots against.
NYI -2.85 goals saved above expected on 27 shots against.
NYR Took 4 penalties for 8 PIM vs 7 for 22 on the other side.
NYI Took 7 penalties for 22 PIM vs 4 for 8 on the other side.
Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral
NYR Finishing +2.85 goals vs xG plus +0.94 GSAx of save luck = +3.79 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.
NYI Finishing -0.94 goals vs xG plus -2.85 GSAx of save luck = -3.79 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.
S. Varlamov allowed 6 on 27 shots (0.778) — 2.85 goals worse than expected.
Reassess the crease rotation before the next start.
Gave up 21 rush shots worth 2.31 xG (3 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.
Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.
Scored 6 on 3.15 xG — +2.85 above expected. Shooting luck like that regresses.
3 goals on 21 rush shots worth 2.31 xG.
Took 7 penalties for 22 minutes (opponent: 4 for 8).
Cut the stick infractions — the penalty differential is a controllable.
0-for-6 on high-danger chances worth 1.25 xG — that conversion rate won't stay at zero.
Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.