Backcheck
Pick club
Motion-blurred skater in a Edmonton Oilers sweater
← Sat, Sep 26 · the slate
Breakdown · CGY at EDM · Preseason

Oilers pull away from the Flames

FinalSat, Sep 26
CGYCalgary Flames1EDMEdmonton Oilers4
The verdict · coin flip

The Oilers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

CGY 1 · EDM 4
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 27, 12:28 AMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Edmonton's 4-1 victory over Calgary appeared to settle the matter, but the underlying metrics suggested a far closer contest. The Oilers' expected goals edge was marginal — 3.03 to 2.91 — yet they won by three. Goaltending decided the game.

D. Levi was 1.91 goals better than the model expected. D. Wolf was 0.97 goals worse than expected. The gap between them accounted for the margin.

The Oilers were dangerous in transition, building 22 rush chances and converting four into goals, while Calgary couldn't capitalize on comparable opportunities. They held 54% of shot attempts (28-24 on goal). The Oilers generated 0.062 expected goals per shot versus Calgary's 0.043.

On the power play, both teams cashed in. Z. Hyman scored early on the man advantage, and C. McDavid added a second-period five-on-four goal. M. Coronato answered for Calgary late, but Edmonton's finishing and Calgary's goaltending struggles had already settled it.

The goals

  • EDM 0–1, 16:46 of the first on the power play. Z. Hyman, wrist shot from 6 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Assists: C. McDavid, E. Bouchard. Win probability moved 17 points.
  • EDM 0–2, 07:55 of the second. C. McDavid, snap shot from 25 feet, a 5% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Assists: L. Draisaitl, V. Podkolzin. 8 seconds after a CGY giveaway by J. Middleton. Win probability moved 14 points.
  • EDM 0–3, 13:26 of the second. R. Shea, slap shot from 41 feet, an 8% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Assists: K. Kapanen, R. Nugent-Hopkins. Win probability moved 7 points.
  • CGY 1–3, 09:06 of the third on the power play. M. Coronato, snap shot from 13 feet, a 20% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Levi. Assists: M. Gridin, J. Farabee.
  • EDM 1–4, 10:52 of the third. K. Kapanen, wrist shot from 9 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Assists: R. Nugent-Hopkins, M. Ekholm. 10 seconds after a CGY blocked shot by M. Ekholm.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Preseason · Sep 26
CGY
1
EDM
4

Oilers pull away from the Flames

Chances 2.9 – 3.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Oilers took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
CGY
2.91
EDM
3.03
49% of the chances51%

The board read CGY 1, EDM 4. The chances read CGY 2.9, EDM 3.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
EDM
+1.0
goals above expected
EDM3.03 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
CGY2.91 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Flames left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+17
win-probability points
54% → 71% for EDM
EDM 100%the game, start to finish
CGY 100%P1 · P2 · P3
EDMP1 16:46 · PP

Z. Hyman makes it 0–1.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 16:46EDMZ. HymanPP14%0–1
  2. P2 07:55EDMC. McDavid5%0–2
  3. P2 13:26EDMR. Shea8%0–3
  4. P3 09:06CGYM. CoronatoPP20%1–3
  5. P3 10:52EDMK. Kapanen14%1–4
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CGY
43 shots
1
Final
82 shots
EDM
39 shots
4
CGY attackEDM attack
CGY EDM Goal
43
shots · 1 in
39
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CGYEDM
1 / 2
0.38 xG
High danger
0 / 2
0.38 xG
0 / 22
2.00 xG
Medium
3 / 22
2.32 xG
0 / 43
0.53 xG
Low
1 / 25
0.32 xG

High-danger looks: CGY 1 of 2, EDM 0 of 2.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
D. Levi
+1.9
EDM · 23/24 · 60:00
Best save · a 19% chance, wrist from 7 ft · P2 03:26
D-
D. Wolf
−1.0
CGY · 24/28 · 60:00
Best save · a 20% chance, wrist from 6 ft · P2 00:43
Best skater on the ice
A+
EDM
C. McDavid
C · impact 2.55
19:33
Ice time
1–1
G – A
0.77
Own xG
64%
xG share
Impact · top 4
C. McDavid2.5A+
K. Kapanen1.5A+
V. Podkolzin1.4A+
E. Bouchard1.4A
Report card
CGYEDM
OffenseB-B-
DefenseD+D+
TransitionB-D+
Special teamsA-A+
GoaltendingDA
DisciplineBD
LuckFA+
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why EDM won
  1. 01Dangerous off the rush
  2. 02D. Levi tilted the crease
  3. 03Power play cashed in
Why CGY lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Cold finishing night
  3. 03PDO ran cold
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Oilers pull away from the Flames

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–9
  1. 16:46EDMZ. Hymanpower play(C. McDavid, E. Bouchard)0–1

    Wrist shot from 6 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Win probability moved 17 points.On the ice: M. Joseph, R. Shea, A. Formenton, S. Mukhamadullin, C. Dach · against J. Middleton, M. Pospisil, A. Klapka, Z. Parekh, M. Tsyplakov

2ndshots 11–14
  1. 07:55EDMC. McDavid(L. Draisaitl, V. Podkolzin)0–2

    Snap shot from 25 feet, a 5% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past D. Wolf. 8s after a CGY giveaway by J. Middleton. Win probability moved 14 points.On the ice: C. Murphy, K. Kapanen, J. Walman, T. Frederic, O. Michaels · against M. Backlund, Z. Whitecloud, J. Farabee, Y. Kuznetsov, S. Honzek

  2. 13:26EDMR. Shea(K. Kapanen, R. Nugent-Hopkins)0–3

    Slap shot from 41 feet, an 8% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past D. Wolf. Win probability moved 7 points.On the ice: M. Joseph, R. Shea, A. Formenton, S. Mukhamadullin, C. Dach · against R. Strome, Z. Whitecloud, Y. Sharangovich, C. Zary, Y. Kuznetsov

3rdshots 8–5
  1. 09:06CGYM. Coronatopower play(M. Gridin, J. Farabee)1–3

    Snap shot from 13 feet, a 20% chance (off the rush), past D. Levi.On the ice: R. Strome, K. Bahl, Y. Sharangovich, C. Zary, S. Nemec · against Z. Hyman, R. Nugent-Hopkins, L. Draisaitl, J. Walman, S. Mukhamadullin

  2. 10:52EDMK. Kapanen(R. Nugent-Hopkins, M. Ekholm)1–4

    Wrist shot from 9 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past D. Wolf. 10s after a CGY block.On the ice: C. Murphy, J. Walman, V. Podkolzin, O. Michaels · against R. Strome, K. Bahl, Y. Sharangovich, Z. Parekh

score reads CGY–EDM

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.03
EDM chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.0
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.067
EDM puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
42.2%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.91Expected goals3.03
EDM 51% of the chance quality
24Shots on goal28
2High-danger chances2
67All attempts (Corsi)49
Adjusted for score: CGY 63% · EDM 37%
Faceoffs · EDM won63%off37%neu88%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CGY1 / 2 · 0.38 xG
EDM0 / 2 · 0.38 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CGY0 / 22 · 2.00 xG
EDM3 / 22 · 2.32 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CGY0 / 43 · 0.53 xG
EDM1 / 25 · 0.32 xG

CGY went 0-for-22 from medium danger on 2.00 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CGY
1 G · 2.91 xG · -1.9
EDM
4 G · 3.03 xG · +1.0
012345

CGY finished -1.9 against expected, EDM +1.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CGY
WRIST0/20
TIP IN0/10
SLAP0/5
SNAP1/4
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/24
EDM
WRIST2/20
TIP IN0/5
SLAP1/7
SNAP1/3
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/10
CGY
EDM
Off the rush
1 G on 33
2.59 xG
4 G on 22
2.42 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0
0.00 xG
0 G on 5
0.33 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CGY went 0-for-20, EDM 2-for-20. EDM scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
D. Wolf
CGY · 24/28 · .857
started · 60:00 · loss
-1.0
saved above expected
D-
the night
Attempts faced
38
Avg chance faced
8.0%
Stopped vs expected
0.895 vs 0.920
Rebounds allowed
4
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/20.4+0.4
Medium3/222.3-0.7
Low1/140.3-0.7
Shorthanded1/10.1-0.9
Tips & deflections0/50.4+0.4
The save
20% chance stopped, a wrist from 6 ft · P2 00:43
The one to have back
5% chance went in, a snap from 25 ft · P2 07:55

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Levi
EDM · 23/24 · .958
started · 60:00 · win
+1.9
saved above expected
A
the night
Attempts faced
43
Avg chance faced
6.8%
Stopped vs expected
0.977 vs 0.932
Rebounds allowed
0
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/20.4-0.6
Medium0/222.0+2.0
Low0/190.5+0.5
Shorthanded1/90.8-0.2
Tips & deflections0/100.6+0.6
The save
19% chance stopped, a wrist from 7 ft · P2 03:26
The one to have back
20% chance went in, a snap from 13 ft · P3 09:06

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Every skater who dressed

Who played

Rated on what they produced and how fast

Best skater on the ice by our rating: C. McDavid (EDM), 19:33 of ice, 1-1, 64% of the expected goals while he was out.

CGY18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
J. FarabeeL15:290-162A
M. CoronatoR16:461-043A
M. GridinR15:420-142B
M. TsyplakovR13:490-055B
M. BacklundC16:070-045B
Z. ParekhD21:070-055C
S. HonzekL14:260-057C
C. ZaryC16:450-059C
M. FrostC15:540-053C
R. StromeC16:060-052C
Y. SharangovichC15:450-052D
M. PospisilC11:290-048D
A. KlapkaR13:090-048D
J. MiddletonD15:050-046D
Z. WhitecloudD17:450-044D
Y. KuznetsovD17:420-046F
S. NemecD23:310-039F
K. BahlD21:000-050F
EDM18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
C. McDavidC19:331-164A+
K. KapanenR15:311-128A+
V. PodkolzinR15:340-173A+
E. BouchardD23:220-167A
L. DraisaitlC18:580-163A
R. Nugent-HopkinsC16:500-222A
R. SheaD18:091-041B
Z. HymanL15:331-026B
M. EkholmD20:160-154B
O. MichaelsR10:560-052B
J. WalmanD19:480-049C
T. FredericC10:210-057C
A. FormentonL12:430-052C
S. MukhamadullinD16:290-058D
M. JosephR12:190-048D
I. HowardL12:390-047D
C. DachC12:410-047F
C. MurphyD21:440-034F

xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

Scratched, CGY: J. Huberdeau, R. Rafikov, J. Hanley, L. Philp, P. Karnaukhov, A. Gallant and 36 more. Scratched, EDM: F. Andersen, S. Griffith, M. Janmark, J. Dickinson, T. Jarry, M. Jones and 32 more. Referees Chris Schlenker and Riley Brace; linesmen Bevan Mills and Trent Knorr.

Graded against a league-average game

Report card

Seven dimensions · A+ to F
DimensionCGYEDM
Offense
▸Basis

CGY Created 2.91 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 2 high-danger shots (0.38 xG) and 33 rush shots (2.59 xG).

EDM Created 3.03 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 2 high-danger shots (0.38 xG) and 22 rush shots (2.42 xG).

B-
82
B-
82
Defense
▸Basis

CGY Allowed 3.03 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 2 high-danger shots (0.38 xG) and 22 rush shots (2.42 xG).

EDM Allowed 2.91 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 2 high-danger shots (0.38 xG) and 33 rush shots (2.59 xG).

D+
68
D+
68
Transition
▸Basis

CGY Rush shots 33–22, rush xG 2.59–2.42 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

EDM Rush shots 22–33, rush xG 2.42–2.59 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

B-
82
D+
68
Special teams
▸Basis

CGY 1-for-3 on the power play (33%; league ≈21%) with 0.79 PP xG.

EDM 1-for-1 on the power play (100%; league ≈21%) with 0.14 PP xG.

A-
92
A+
100
Goaltending
▸Basis

CGY -0.97 goals saved above expected on 28 shots against.

EDM +1.91 goals saved above expected on 24 shots against.

D
65
A
94
Discipline
▸Basis

CGY Took 2 penalties for 4 PIM vs 4 for 8 on the other side.

EDM Took 4 penalties for 8 PIM vs 2 for 4 on the other side.

B
85
D
65
Luck

Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

▸Basis

CGY Finishing -1.91 goals vs xG plus -0.97 GSAx of save luck = -2.88 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

EDM Finishing +0.97 goals vs xG plus +1.91 GSAx of save luck = +2.88 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

F
52
A+
98
Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
What the model flagged
WARNINGCGY

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 22 rush shots worth 2.42 xG (4 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHEDM

Dangerous off the rush

4 goals on 22 rush shots worth 2.42 xG.

WARNINGEDM

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 33 rush shots worth 2.59 xG (1 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHCGY

Dangerous off the rush

1 goals on 33 rush shots worth 2.59 xG.

LUCKCGY

Cold finishing night

Scored 1 on 2.91 xG — -1.91 vs expected. The looks were there; the finish will come back.

STRENGTHEDM

D. Levi tilted the crease

D. Levi stopped 23 of 24 (0.958), +1.91 goals above expected.

82 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CGY
43 shots
1
Final
82 shots
EDM
39 shots
4
CGY attackEDM attack
CGY EDM Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CGY left, EDM right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. McDavid
#97 · C · EDM
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 19:33 on ice · +1
R. Nugent-Hopkins
#93 · C · EDM
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:50 on ice · +2
K. Kapanen
#42 · R · EDM
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 15:31 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Sep 26
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Model draft
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The rates below are last season's; this exhibition will not count toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 26, 2:16 PMRaw model copyDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a CGY 3.0 - 3.5 EDM game with the Oilers at 58% win probability.

Keys to the game

  • The Oilers own the underlying play . The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.2% 5v5 xG vs 46.5%.
  • Defensive Structure: Oilers. High-danger team. Prioritize net-front battles and box-outs over shot-blocking.
  • Goalie Weakness: Oilers. Below-average on high-danger saves. Prioritize quality over quantity.

Season 5v5 Numbers

MetricCGYEDM
xG%46.5%52.2%
Corsi%49.2%50.2%
PDO0.9840.981

Rates from 2025-26 — the 2026-27 sample isn't live yet.

Where the Edges Live

  • The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.2% 5v5 xG vs 46.5%.

Regression Watch

  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.981 — running cold, due for positive regression.
  • The Flames' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.

Goaltending Matchup

  • Goalie matchup: D. Cooley (+10.1 GSAx in 31 GP, 90.9% SV) vs T. Jarry (-11.9 GSAx in 33 GP, 88.2% SV).
  • D. Cooley has the GSAx edge — 22.0 goals above his counterpart this season.
  • T. Jarry has struggled — 88.2% SV over 33 starts.

Players to Watch

Key Matchups

CGY

  • CGY scores 42% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot
  • Their goalie (Devin Cooley) leaks HD — 79.7% HD SV. Get to the slot.

EDM

  • EDM scores 59% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot
  • Their goalie is -11.9 GSAx — significantly below expected. Shoot early and often.

Tactical Notes

  • CGY: 0% HD goal rate, 0% rebound goal rate
  • EDM: 1% HD goal rate, 0% rebound goal rate

Data: NHL API, Backcheck xG model

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

EDM 58%
58%
EDM
Model favorite
42%
58%
CGY50EDM

EDM by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CGY 3.0–3.5 EDM; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
CGY← edge
edge →EDM
46.5%52.2%
49.2%50.2%
2.853.38
3.283.10
2.543.44
3.123.23
0.9840.981

EDM holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.984 vs 0.981) says CGY has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
CGY
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
EDM
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
0.984
CGY PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.981
EDM PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

TACTICAL

The Oilers own the underlying play

The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.2% 5v5 xG vs 46.5%.

TACTICALEDM

Defensive Structure: Oilers

High-danger team. Prioritize net-front battles and box-outs over shot-blocking.

CGY scores 42% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot

TACTICALEDM

Goalie Weakness: Oilers

Below-average on high-danger saves. Prioritize quality over quantity.

Their goalie (Devin Cooley) leaks HD — 79.7% HD SV. Get to the slot.

TACTICALCGY

Defensive Structure: Flames

High-danger team. Prioritize net-front battles and box-outs over shot-blocking.

EDM scores 59% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot

Where the edges live
  • The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.2% 5v5 xG vs 46.5%.
Regression watch
  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.981 — running cold, due for positive regression.
  • The Flames' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.2% 5v5 xG vs 46.5%.
  • Goalie matchup: D. Cooley (+10.1 GSAx in 31 GP, 90.9% SV) vs T. Jarry (-11.9 GSAx in 33 GP, 88.2% SV).
  • D. Cooley has the GSAx edge — 22.0 goals above his counterpart this season.
  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.981 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
CGY
preseason · vs SEA · Thu, Sep 24
Expected in goal
D. Cooley
1 day rest.885 last start65:00 played
Backup Dustin Wolf · +0.6 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • R. Kerins17:08
  • D. Hunt16:37
  • B. Jones18:02
  • J. Castagna13:04
  • T. Gross15:20
  • S. Morton18:38
  • A. Basha10:30
  • C. Harrington11:04
  • A. Suniev20:14
  • W. Stromgren16:55
  • B. Othmann12:14
  • A. Nylander21:28
Defence · 6
  • A. Englund17:35
  • M. Benning22:11
  • J. Livingstone17:37
  • J. Hanley20:11
  • H. Brzustewicz25:40
  • B. Pachal16:32
EDM
preseason · vs VAN · Thu, Sep 24
Expected in goal
T. Jarry
1 day rest.962 last start60:00 played
Backup Stuart Skinner · +7.5 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • Q. Hutson15:55
  • E. Tralmaks11:36
  • A. Raty12:47
  • O. Michaels17:48
  • M. Jones17:05
  • D. Lewandowski12:23
  • I. Howard17:59
  • W. Nicholl07:05
  • V. Marjala15:24
  • C. Clattenburg15:50
  • R. Berzkalns11:52
  • J. Samanski17:45
Defence · 6
  • S. Stastney25:41
  • A. Leppanen05:26
  • T. Emberson26:18
  • R. Stillman17:51
  • D. Carfagna25:25
  • T. Cibulka17:00

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Keep going

Where to next

Back to the front page