Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · NJD at NYI · Preseason

Devils pull away from the Islanders

The verdict · earned

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NJD 4 · NYI 1
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 27, 12:26 AMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Expected goals split 3.19–3.62 in favor of the Devils — a slight edge — yet the final score read 4–1 because J. Allen stole the whole thing.

J. Allen saved 2.19 goals above what his expected save percentage should have allowed. The Islanders squeezed more value from fewer chances — 0.084 expected goals per shot versus 0.059 for New Jersey — but finished just one goal despite generating 4 dangerous scoring chances to the Devils' 7. I. Sorokin's save percentage of 0.846 couldn't match Allen's theft.

The Devils leaned on their transition. They scored three times off the rush on 29 chances, the kind of conversion rate that wins games but rarely sustains. E. Rodrigues and J. Siegenthaler each picked up two assists, turning opportunity into goals.

The power play cashed in early. L. Evangelista scored twice, once on the man advantage in the first period and again early in the second — both low-danger looks converted because the Devils executed timing. The second came just four seconds after a J. Siegenthaler shot, the kind of chaos that feeds finishing.

New York held 37% of shot attempts (15–26 on goal) but couldn't capitalize. S. Holmstrom's third-period goal was the only answer to the barrage. The Islanders underperformed their expected goal total by 2.19 — a chasm between quality and result that Allen filled.

The goals

  • NJD 1–0, 06:13 of the first on the power play. L. Evangelista, wrist shot from 15 feet, a 17% chance by the model (off the rush), past I. Sorokin. Assists: J. Hughes, L. Hughes. Win probability moved 15 points.
  • NJD 2–0, 00:42 of the second. A. Gritsyuk, wrist shot from 37 feet, a 6% chance by the model (off the rush), past I. Sorokin. Assists: E. Rodrigues. Win probability moved 15 points.
  • NJD 3–0, 01:01 of the second. L. Evangelista, wrist shot from 5 feet, a 23% chance by the model, past I. Sorokin. Assists: N. Hischier, J. Siegenthaler. 4 seconds after a NJD shot by J. Siegenthaler. Win probability moved 10 points.
  • NJD 4–0, 14:48 of the second. D. Hamilton, snap shot from 13 feet, a 22% chance by the model (off the rush), past I. Sorokin. Assists: J. Siegenthaler, E. Rodrigues.
  • NYI 4–1, 15:21 of the third. S. Holmstrom, wrist shot from 22 feet, a 17% chance by the model, past J. Allen. Assists: K. Palmieri, B. Horvat. 9 seconds after a NYI missed shot by S. Holmstrom.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Preseason · Sep 26
NJD
4
NYI
1

Devils pull away from the Islanders

Chances 3.6 – 3.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Devils earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NJD
3.62
NYI
3.19
53% of the chances47%

The board read NJD 4, NYI 1. The chances read NJD 3.6, NYI 3.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
+0.4
goals above expected
NJD3.62 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.19 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Islanders left 2.2 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+15
win-probability points
46% → 61% for NJD
NYI 100%the game, start to finish
NJD 100%P1 · P2 · P3
NJDP1 06:13 · PP

L. Evangelista makes it 1–0.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:13NJDL. EvangelistaPP17%1–0
  2. P2 00:42NJDA. Gritsyuk6%2–0
  3. P2 01:01NJDL. Evangelista23%3–0
  4. P2 14:48NJDD. Hamilton22%4–0
  5. P3 15:21NYIS. Holmstrom17%4–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NJD
41 shots
4
Final
71 shots
NYI
30 shots
1
NJD attackNYI attack
NJD NYI Goal
41
shots · 4 in
30
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NJDNYI
2 / 7
1.44 xG
High danger
0 / 4
1.05 xG
2 / 16
1.76 xG
Medium
1 / 18
2.01 xG
0 / 38
0.43 xG
Low
0 / 16
0.13 xG

The Islanders went 0 for 4 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Allen
+2.2
NJD · 14/15 · 60:00
Best save · a 32% chance, wrist from 4 ft · P3 00:43
D
I. Sorokin
−0.4
NYI · 22/26 · 59:55
Best save · a 22% chance, snap from 11 ft · P3 04:31
Best skater on the ice
A+
NJD
J. Siegenthaler
D · impact 2.07
21:40
Ice time
0–2
G – A
0.29
Own xG
70%
xG share
Impact · top 4
J. Siegenthaler2.1A+
L. Evangelista1.8A+
N. Hischier1.5A+
D. Hamilton1.5A
Report card
NJDNYI
OffenseAB+
DefenseDF
TransitionB-C-
Special teamsA+F
GoaltendingA+C-
DisciplineDB
LuckAF
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why NJD won
  1. 01J. Allen stole it
  2. 02Dangerous off the rush
  3. 03Power play cashed in
Why NYI lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Cold finishing night
  3. 03Power play came up empty
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Devils pull away from the Islanders

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–7
  1. 06:13NJDL. Evangelistapower play(J. Hughes, L. Hughes)1–0

    Wrist shot from 15 feet, a 17% chance (off the rush), past I. Sorokin. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: D. Hamilton, C. Brown, J. Siegenthaler, C. Glass, A. Lombardi · against K. Palmieri, C. Cizikas, O. Palat, A. Romanov, M. Kessel

2ndshots 10–3
  1. 00:42NJDA. Gritsyuk(E. Rodrigues)2–0

    Wrist shot from 37 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past I. Sorokin. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: D. Hamilton, J. Siegenthaler, T. Meier, N. Hischier, L. Evangelista · against S. Mayfield, A. Duclair, I. George, C. Ritchie, V. Eklund

  2. 01:01NJDL. Evangelista(N. Hischier, J. Siegenthaler)3–0

    Wrist shot from 5 feet, a 23% chance, past I. Sorokin. 4s after a NJD shot by J. Siegenthaler. Win probability moved 10 points.On the ice: B. Dillon, A. Mantha, J. Bratt, D. Chisholm, J. Hughes · against A. Pelech, B. Horvat, S. Holmstrom, M. Maccelli, M. Kessel

  3. 14:48NJDD. Hamilton(J. Siegenthaler, E. Rodrigues)4–0

    Snap shot from 13 feet, a 22% chance (off the rush), past I. Sorokin.On the ice: B. Dillon, T. Meier, N. Hischier, D. Chisholm, L. Evangelista · against K. Palmieri, J. Pageau, E. Heineman, M. Kessel, K. Aitcheson

3rdshots 6–5
  1. 15:21NYIS. Holmstrom(K. Palmieri, B. Horvat)4–1

    Wrist shot from 22 feet, a 17% chance, past J. Allen. 9s after a NYI miss by S. Holmstrom.On the ice: J. Pageau, R. Pulock, A. Romanov, E. Heineman, V. Eklund · against B. Pesce, T. Meier, N. Hischier, L. Evangelista, L. Hughes

score reads NJD–NYI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.62
NJD chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.4
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.039
NJD puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
61.6%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.62Expected goals3.19
NJD 53% of the chance quality
26Shots on goal15
7High-danger chances4
61All attempts (Corsi)38
Adjusted for score: NJD 56% · NYI 44%
Faceoffs · NYI won55%off36%neu58%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD2 / 7 · 1.44 xG
NYI0 / 4 · 1.05 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD2 / 16 · 1.76 xG
NYI1 / 18 · 2.01 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD0 / 38 · 0.43 xG
NYI0 / 16 · 0.13 xG

NYI went 0-for-4 from high danger on 1.05 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
4 G · 3.62 xG · +0.4
NYI
1 G · 3.19 xG · -2.2
012345

NJD finished +0.4 against expected, NYI -2.2.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST3/28
SLAP0/6
SNAP1/3
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/20
NYI
WRIST1/13
SLAP0/6
SNAP0/8
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/8
NJD
NYI
Off the rush
3 G on 29
2.64 xG
0 G on 21
2.55 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3
0.42 xG
0 G on 1
0.20 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 3-for-28, NYI 1-for-13. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Allen
NJD · 14/15 · .933
started · 60:00 · win
+2.2
saved above expected
A
the night
Attempts faced
30
Avg chance faced
10.6%
Stopped vs expected
0.967 vs 0.894
Rebounds allowed
1
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/41.1+1.1
Medium1/182.0+1.0
Low0/80.1+0.1
Shorthanded0/60.5+0.5
Tips & deflections0/30.2+0.2
The save
32% chance stopped, a wrist from 4 ft · P3 00:43
The one to have back
17% chance went in, a wrist from 22 ft · P3 15:21

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Sorokin
NYI · 22/26 · .846
started · 59:55 · loss
-0.4
saved above expected
D
the night
Attempts faced
41
Avg chance faced
8.8%
Stopped vs expected
0.902 vs 0.912
Rebounds allowed
3
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/71.4-0.6
Medium2/161.8-0.2
Low0/180.4+0.4
Shorthanded1/60.7-0.3
Tips & deflections0/30.2+0.2
The save
22% chance stopped, a snap from 11 ft · P3 04:31
The one to have back
6% chance went in, a wrist from 37 ft · P2 00:42

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Every skater who dressed

Who played

Rated on what they produced and how fast

Best skater on the ice by our rating: J. Siegenthaler (NJD), 21:40 of ice, 0-2, 70% of the expected goals while he was out.

NJD18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
J. SiegenthalerD21:400-270A+
L. EvangelistaR14:572-053A+
N. HischierC16:100-180A+
D. HamiltonD19:521-065A
E. RodriguesC13:020-243A
A. GritsyukR14:531-034A
J. HughesC17:340-140B
C. BrownR14:090-065B
L. HughesD23:310-142B
A. LombardiC11:160-077C
C. GlassC12:530-069C
A. ManthaR12:330-052C
B. DillonD17:390-054C
D. MercerC14:350-059C
T. MeierR13:320-052D
J. BrattL16:120-049D
D. ChisholmD16:480-043F
B. PesceD19:330-021F
NYI18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
E. HeinemanL17:360-072A
K. PalmieriC18:160-145A
S. HolmstromR22:321-034B
A. DuclairL18:250-055B
C. CizikasC14:040-069B
B. HorvatC17:360-133B
V. EklundR15:070-055C
A. RomanovD18:180-042C
M. MaccelliL18:020-048C
M. KesselD15:280-051D
J. PageauC15:170-053D
R. PulockD17:410-052D
A. PelechD16:270-051D
O. PalatL14:510-037D
I. GeorgeD10:430-044D
C. RitchieC17:080-037F
K. AitchesonD16:100-034F
S. MayfieldD12:580-035F

xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

Scratched, NJD: N. Bjugstad, S. Noesen, C. White, R. Tufte, D. Rittich, J. Boqvist and 31 more. Scratched, NYI: S. Varlamov, B. Schenn, T. DeAngelo, P. Engvall, M. Highmore, M. Barzal and 32 more. Referees Jake Brenk and Alex Lepkowski; linesmen Shandor Alphonso and Anthony Lapointe.

Graded against a league-average game

Report card

Seven dimensions · A+ to F
DimensionNJDNYI
Offense
▸Basis

NJD Created 3.62 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 7 high-danger shots (1.44 xG) and 29 rush shots (2.64 xG).

NYI Created 3.19 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 4 high-danger shots (1.05 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.55 xG).

A
93
B+
87
Defense
▸Basis

NJD Allowed 3.19 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 4 high-danger shots (1.05 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.55 xG).

NYI Allowed 3.62 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 7 high-danger shots (1.44 xG) and 29 rush shots (2.64 xG).

D
63
F
57
Transition
▸Basis

NJD Rush shots 29–21, rush xG 2.64–2.55 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

NYI Rush shots 21–29, rush xG 2.55–2.64 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

B-
80
C-
70
Special teams
▸Basis

NJD 1-for-2 on the power play (50%; league ≈21%) with 0.67 PP xG.

NYI 0-for-4 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.47 PP xG.

A+
100
F
53
Goaltending
▸Basis

NJD +2.19 goals saved above expected on 15 shots against.

NYI -0.38 goals saved above expected on 26 shots against.

A+
97
C-
71
Discipline
▸Basis

NJD Took 4 penalties for 8 PIM vs 2 for 4 on the other side.

NYI Took 2 penalties for 4 PIM vs 4 for 8 on the other side.

D
65
B
85
Luck

Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

▸Basis

NJD Finishing +0.38 goals vs xG plus +2.19 GSAx of save luck = +2.57 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

NYI Finishing -2.19 goals vs xG plus -0.38 GSAx of save luck = -2.57 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

A
96
F
54
Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
What the model flagged
WARNINGNYI

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 29 rush shots worth 2.64 xG (3 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHNJD

Dangerous off the rush

3 goals on 29 rush shots worth 2.64 xG.

STRENGTHNJD

J. Allen stole it

J. Allen stopped 14 of 15 (0.933) — +2.19 goals saved above expected in a 3-goal game.

LUCKNYI

Cold finishing night

Scored 1 on 3.19 xG — -2.19 vs expected. The looks were there; the finish will come back.

WARNINGNJD

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 21 rush shots worth 2.55 xG (0 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHNYI

Dangerous off the rush

0 goals on 21 rush shots worth 2.55 xG.

71 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NJD
41 shots
4
Final
71 shots
NYI
30 shots
1
NJD attackNYI attack
NJD NYI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NJD left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Siegenthaler
#71 · D · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:40 on ice · +2
L. Evangelista
#77 · R · NJD
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 14:57 on ice · +2
E. Rodrigues
#17 · C · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 13:02 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Sep 26
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Model draft
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The rates below are last season's; this exhibition will not count toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 26, 5:14 PMRaw model copyDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a NJD 3.3 - 3.3 NYI game with the Devils at 50% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Keys to the game

  • Ilya Sorokin has been a season-long wall. Ilya Sorokin: +31.4 GSAx over 55 games (0.906 SV%).
  • Jacob Markstrom has leaked goals all season. Jacob Markstrom: -16.2 GSAx over 44 games.
  • S. Varlamov on a back-to-back. S. Varlamov projects to start on no rest, the second night of a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or tired legs.

Season 5v5 Numbers

MetricNJDNYI
xG%50.7%47.7%
Corsi%51.3%49.0%
PDO0.9710.992

Rates from 2025-26 — the 2026-27 sample isn't live yet.

Regression Watch

  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.

Goaltending Matchup

  • Goalie matchup: N. Daws (+0.6 GSAx in 3 GP, 90.8% SV) vs S. Varlamov.
  • S. Varlamov is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.

Players to Watch

NJD

  • Stefan Noesen — 0.83 xG/60, 2G 4A, 2 HD goals, 3.8% shooting

NYI

  • Emil Heineman — 0.94 xG/60, 15G 9A, 4 HD goals, 8.6% shooting

Key Matchups

NJD

  • NJD scores 57% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot
  • NJD scores 20 rebound goals (15% of total) — clear the crease

NYI

  • NYI scores 45% of goals from HD — collapse and protect the slot
  • Attack when Alexander Romanov (D) is on ice — 2.88 xGA/60

Tactical Notes

  • NJD: 1% HD goal rate, 0% rebound goal rate
  • NJD defensive weak link: Lenni Hameenaho
  • NYI: 0% HD goal rate, 0% rebound goal rate
  • NYI defensive weak link: Alexander Romanov

Data: NHL API, Backcheck xG model

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NJD 50%
50%
NJD
Model favorite
50%
50%
NJD50NYI

NJD by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NJD 3.3–3.3 NYI; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD← edge
edge →NYI
50.7%47.7%
51.3%49.0%
3.163.13
3.073.43
2.762.79
3.092.88
0.9710.992

NJD holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.971 vs 0.992) says NYI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
NJD
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
NYI
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.992
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

STRENGTHNYI

Ilya Sorokin has been a season-long wall

Ilya Sorokin: +31.4 GSAx over 55 games (0.906 SV%).

WARNINGNYI

S. Varlamov on a back-to-back

S. Varlamov projects to start on no rest, the second night of a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or tired legs.

Test the goalie early with traffic and second-chance pressure.

WARNINGNJD

Jacob Markstrom has leaked goals all season

Jacob Markstrom: -16.2 GSAx over 44 games.

Shoot from everywhere — volume beats a cold crease.

WARNINGNJD

Exploitable minutes: Lenni Hameenaho

Lenni Hameenaho is on ice for 2.55 xGA/60 and 22 high-danger shots against this season.

Hunt matchups against Lenni Hameenaho's shifts with the top line.

Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • Goalie matchup: N. Daws (+0.6 GSAx in 3 GP, 90.8% SV) vs S. Varlamov.
  • S. Varlamov is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NJD
preseason · vs NYR · Thu, Sep 24
Expected in goal
N. Daws
1 day rest.870 last start63:27 played
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -16.2 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • R. Tufte14:26
  • S. Noesen19:29
  • S. Lachance12:24
  • M. McLaughlin14:36
  • L. Hameenaho17:56
  • C. White14:43
  • B. Steeves15:33
  • R. Schmelzer12:59
  • M. Melovsky16:28
  • X. Parent13:20
  • J. Boqvist18:45
  • A. Lombardi20:40
Defence · 6
  • V. Kolyachonok22:48
  • S. Casey11:50
  • T. Vilen22:35
  • A. Silaev19:48
  • M. Diotte22:06
  • E. Edwards25:38
NYI
preseason · vs NYR · Fri, Sep 25
Expected in goal
S. Varlamov
back-to-back.778 last start60:00 played
Backup Ilya Sorokin · +31.4 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.
Forwards · 12
  • A. Duclair17:06
  • P. Engvall19:07
  • M. Highmore09:41
  • M. Luff11:43
  • M. Chaffee14:54
  • K. MacLean17:13
  • L. Foudy17:29
  • A. Jefferies10:58
  • E. Heineman16:38
  • D. Kuefler15:03
  • C. Eiserman15:07
  • D. Prokhorov14:16
Defence · 6
  • M. Kessel15:27
  • R. Pulock18:29
  • A. Romanov20:24
  • I. George17:32
  • K. Aitcheson22:27
  • T. DeAngelo21:11

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD
Stefan Noesen2G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 3.8% sh
NYI
Emil Heineman15G 9A
0.94 xG/60 · 4 HD · 8.6% sh
Keep going

Where to next