Capitals run the Lightning off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Washington's 3-2 overtime victory obscures the underlying gap: the Capitals generated 4.21 expected goals to Tampa Bay's 2.38, held 64 percent of shot quality, and underperformed their xG by 1.21 goals.
The Capitals controlled play comprehensively. They held 60 percent of shot attempts (28–19 on goal) and led high-danger chances 8–5. Both teams were lethal in transition — Washington three goals on 26 chances, Tampa two on 20 — but the Capitals' volume advantage told. L. Thompson made 17 saves on 19 shots and was perfect on high-danger attempts (5 for 5). A. Vasilevskiy was also strong: 25 of 28, 1.21 goals above expected.
Tampa Bay's collapse came down to inefficiency: 0 for 5 on their best scoring chances. Washington's cumulative edge in volume and quality, despite underperforming xG, proved sufficient, though only after overtime.
Jakob Chychrun's snap shot from the doorstep at 01:19 of overtime provided the finish the Capitals' underlying dominance had warranted.
The danger ladder
TBL went 2-for-8 from medium danger on 0.91 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
TBL finished -0.4 against expected, WSH -1.2 — A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) saved 1.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: TBL went 0-for-14, WSH 2-for-25. WSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- TBL couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- WSH was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
- TBL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
- WSH created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- TBL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- L. Thompson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.