Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at MTL

Capitals pull away from the Canadiens

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 8 · MTL 4
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Capitals' 8-4 victory masks a far tighter underlying contest—Washington overperformed its expected goals by 2.99, converting chances at an elite rate despite narrowly outplaying Montreal in raw opportunity creation. Controlling 56% of 5v5 expected goals (5.01–3.93), the Capitals won decisively on finishing alone.

Washington's rush attack drove the separation. The Capitals scored 5 goals on 24 rush chances, an exceptional conversion rate that accounted for much of their overperformance. Montreal managed 3 rush goals on 29 attempts, efficient but ultimately insufficient. Washington's power play stretched the lead: 2 goals on 7 shots (0.53 xG), special-teams dominance Montreal couldn't threaten.

Goaltending sealed the result. S. Montembeault (MTL) yielded 1.57 goals more than expected, a collapse that left Montreal defenseless. C. Lindgren (WSH) was steady at 0.857 SV% on 28 shots. When J. Dobes (MTL) took over, Washington had already escaped.

Sonny Milano's snap shot from the top of the circles (P3, 18:34) exemplified Washington's precision in the third period. Montreal crashed the net with 4 rebound opportunities and converted one. Washington created 7 rebounds but found none—an absence that hardly mattered. The Capitals' margin was built through rush scoring, not rebound opportunities.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 20
WSH
8
MTL
4

Capitals pull away from the Canadiens

Chances 5.0 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
5.01
MTL
3.93
56% of the chances44%

The board read WSH 8, MTL 4. The chances read WSH 5.0, MTL 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
+3.0
goals above expected
WSH5.01 expected · 8 scored
Expected
Scored
MTL3.93 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals scored 3.0 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:00WSHA. OvechkinPP1–0
  2. P1 15:47MTLB. GallagherPP1–1
  3. P2 02:00WSHE. FrankPP2–1
  4. P2 03:38WSHE. Frank3–1
  5. P2 07:53MTLJ. Veleno3–2
  6. P2 14:26WSHJ. Chychrun4–2
  7. P2 15:04MTLN. Suzuki4–3
+5 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
54 shots
8
Final
94 shots
MTL
40 shots
4
WSH attackMTL attack
WSH MTL Goal
54
shots · 8 in
40
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHMTL
1 / 5
1.79 xG
High danger
1 / 6
1.60 xG
6 / 22
2.57 xG
Medium
2 / 20
1.96 xG
1 / 45
0.65 xG
Low
1 / 30
0.37 xG

High-danger looks: WSH 1 of 5, MTL 1 of 6.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
S. Montembeault
+2.0
MTL · 7/10
B+
J. Dobes
+1.0
MTL · 21/25
+1 more on the full breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals pull away from the Canadiens

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–12
  1. 01:00WSHA. Ovechkinpower play(D. Strome)1–0
  2. 15:47MTLB. Gallagherpower play(N. Dobson, I. Demidov)1–1
2ndshots 15–7
  1. 02:00WSHE. Frankpower play(A. Ovechkin, D. Strome)2–1
  2. 03:38WSHE. Frank(A. Protas, H. Lapierre)3–1
  3. 07:53MTLJ. Veleno(M. Matheson, B. Gallagher)3–2
  4. 14:26WSHJ. Chychrun(J. Carlson)4–2
  5. 15:04MTLN. Suzuki(A. Carrier, Z. Bolduc)4–3
  6. 17:25WSHS. Milano(E. Frank, R. Sandin)5–3
3rdshots 15–9
  1. 05:37MTLM. Matheson(C. Caufield, L. Hutson)5–4
  2. 16:03WSHA. Ovechkin(D. Strome)6–4
  3. 17:56WSHA. Ovechkinempty net(J. Carlson)7–4
  4. 18:34WSHS. Milano(E. Frank, H. Lapierre)8–4

score reads WSH–MTL

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
5.01
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+3.0
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.040
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
56.2%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

5.01Expected goals3.93
WSH 56% of the chance quality
36Shots on goal28
5High-danger chances6
72All attempts (Corsi)56
Adjusted for score: WSH 51% · MTL 49%
Faceoffs · MTL won43%off74%neu39%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 5 · 1.79 xG
MTL1 / 6 · 1.60 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH6 / 22 · 2.57 xG
MTL2 / 20 · 1.96 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 45 · 0.65 xG
MTL1 / 30 · 0.37 xG

WSH went 6-for-22 from medium danger on 2.57 expected goals — 3.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
8 G · 5.01 xG · +3.0
MTL
4 G · 3.93 xG · +0.1
0123456789

WSH finished +3.0 against expected, MTL +0.1.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
SNAP7/35
TIP IN0/6
SLAP1/5
BACKHAND0/4
WRIST0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/18
MTL
SNAP4/35
TIP IN0/4
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/0
WRIST0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/16
WSH
MTL
Off the rush
5 G on 24
1.97 xG
3 G on 29
2.98 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 7
0.99 xG
1 G on 4
0.62 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: WSH went 7-for-35, MTL 4-for-35. WSH scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
C. Lindgren
WSH · 24/28 · .857
-0.1
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.6+0.6
Medium2/202.0-0.0
Low1/300.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

S. Montembeault
MTL · 7/10 · .700
+2.0
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.8+0.8
Medium6/222.6-3.4
Low1/450.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Dobes
MTL · 21/25 · .840
+1.0
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.8+0.8
Medium6/222.6-3.4
Low1/450.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

94 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
54 shots
8
Final
94 shots
MTL
40 shots
4
WSH attackMTL attack
WSH MTL Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, MTL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Ovechkin
#8 · L · WSH
3 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 15:35 on ice · +1
E. Frank
#53 · R · WSH
2 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 08:51 on ice · +2
D. Strome
#17 · C · WSH
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 18:59 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Nov 20
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:50 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.6–2.6 game with the Canadiens at 50% win probability—essentially a coin flip.

Washington holds a marginal edge at 5v5: 50.0% expected goals to Montreal's 48.0%, with both teams at 49.0% Corsi. The Canadiens have gone underwater lately, sitting at -8 goal differential over their last 10 games. Both teams carry a 1.018 PDO, running hot enough to draw regression. When it comes, it will arrive at both ends.

Cole Caufield is Montreal's offensive core: 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes, 33 goals, 16 assists, shooting at 20.0%. Alex Ovechkin meets him at 0.97 xG/60 for Washington with 19 goals and 17 assists on 13.8% shooting. Anthony Beauvillier offers secondary scoring at 0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, and 9 assists on 10.4%, while Oliver Kapanen fills Montreal's third line at 0.83 xG/60, 19 goals, and 12 assists on 17.8%—with a team-high 4 high-danger goals.

Execution near the net reveals both teams' real weakness. Washington's defensive vulnerability centers on Declan Chisholm, and Montreal's is Mike Matheson. Neither team converts high-danger chances at the rate its underlying metrics suggest—a mutual constraint keeping things tight. Both recorded 0% on rebound and high-danger conversions, markers of unsustainable play.

The 50-50 projection makes perfect sense. Washington's structural advantage in possession barely registers against Montreal's offensive talent and the regression both teams face.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

MTL 50%
50%
MTL
Model favorite
50%
50%
WSH50MTL

MTL by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.6 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →MTL
50.0%48.0%
49.0%49.0%
2.622.41
2.622.62
2.182.24
1.791.96
1.0181.018

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.018) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
3-5-2
-2 GD · 2d rest
MTL
4-3-3
-8 GD · 2d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.018
MTL PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Canadiens' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Canadiens are underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Canadiens' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
C. Lindgren
2 days rest.968 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

MTL
Expected in goal
J. Dobes
2 days rest.870 last start
Backup Jakub Dobes · +17.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next