Backcheck
Recap · DET at WSH

Red Wings run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Red Wings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:05 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DET
Detroit Red Wings
5
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

6.04Expected goals2.72
69% share for the better side
41Shot attempts (SOG)26
12High-danger chances3
70Corsi (all attempts)62
Score-adjusted: 47% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Red Wings rolled past the Capitals 5–2, but the scoreboard understates Detroit's dominance. The Red Wings controlled 69% of expected goals at 5v5 (6.04–2.72), outshot Washington 41–26 on goal attempts, and outmatched them 12–3 in high-danger chances.

The real story is how much worse this could have been. L. Thompson saved 2.04 goals above expected—a performance that kept Washington in the game despite being thoroughly outworked. J. Gibson posted a 0.923 save percentage, underperforming his xG model by 0.72 goals.

Detroit's superiority extended beyond volume. The Red Wings registered 0.086 expected goals per shot, elite finishing territory. Washington managed 0.044 per attempt. Both teams scored twice off the rush, Detroit on 31 chances and Washington on 24, but that parity masks the underlying rout. The Capitals' efficiency on the rush obscures a complete quality deficit elsewhere.

Dylan Larkin's snap shot from the wing in the third period (17:10) exemplified the evening: controlled execution in a game where Detroit imposed its will.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DET2 / 12 · 3.54 xG
WSH0 / 3 · 0.74 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DET3 / 19 · 2.03 xG
WSH1 / 15 · 1.33 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DET0 / 39 · 0.47 xG
WSH1 / 44 · 0.65 xG

DET went 2-for-12 from high danger on 3.54 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DET
5 G · 6.04 xG · -1.0
WSH
2 G · 2.72 xG · -0.7
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GibsonDET
+0.7
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.0

DET finished -1.0 against expected, WSH -0.7 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DET
SNAP4/28
SLAP0/5
WRIST0/9
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND1/7
OTHER0/18
WSH
SNAP2/23
SLAP0/9
WRIST0/2
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/20
DET
WSH
Off the rush
2 G on 31 · 3.39 xG
2 G on 24 · 1.86 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 8 · 1.62 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.21 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: DET went 4-for-28, WSH 2-for-23. DET scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Seider
#53 · D · DET
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:31 TOI · +3
S. Edvinsson
#77 · D · DET
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 22:16 TOI · +3
A. Copp
#18 · C · DET
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 15:23 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 2.0 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (WSH 3, DET 12).
  • DET had the higher quality looks — 0.086 xG/shot vs 0.044.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 31 rush chances.
  • WSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET created 8 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DET at WSH · 12:30 PM ET

Red Wings at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:03 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
WSH
Model favorite
47%
53%
DET50WSH

WSH by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score DET 2.52.7 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DET← edge
edge →WSH
49.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.38xGF / 602.62
2.50xGA / 602.62
1.73Goals for / gm2.18
2.07Goals against / gm1.79
0.985PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.985 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.7 goal game with Washington at 53% to win. This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Detroit and Washington are virtually matched at 5v5. Both teams own Corsi% of 49.0%, and their expected-goal rates barely separate (Detroit 49.0%, Washington 50.0%). The meaningful difference sits in Washington's 1.018 PDO versus Detroit's 0.985: the Capitals are running hot, so expect some regression.

L. Thompson faces a back-to-back, so watch for either a backup or a tired starter.

Alex DeBrincat carries Detroit's offense. He generates 0.88 xG/60 with 17 goals and 28 assists, posting a 9.0% shooting rate and 2 high-danger goals. That mark has room to regress. Marco Kasper supplies secondary scoring at 0.81 xG/60 (7 goals, 8 assists, 1 HD goal) but shoots just 6.1%, suggesting further downside.

Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin, who leads at 0.97 xG/60 with 19 goals and 17 assists, posting 2 high-danger goals and an unsustainable 13.8% shooting rate. Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, 9 assists, 2 HD goals) shoots at 10.4%, also above his probable mean.

Both teams face the same structural trap: 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate. Without secondary scoring, each team depends entirely on its stars' finishing rates, a volatile condition. Axel Sandin-Pellikka is Detroit's defensive weak link; Declan Chisholm is Washington's. Neither side has built the depth to punish mistakes.

Washington's shooting-rate edge (Ovechkin at 13.8%, Beauvillier at 10.4% versus DeBrincat's 9.0% and Kasper's 6.1%) should favor the Capitals over time. But the model correctly captures the tightness: the Capitals' one-goal projected edge is real but razor-thin.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters