Backcheck
Combinations · chemistry

The Line Lab

Which trios actually work when they're on the ice together. We compare what a line shouldproduce given who's on it against what it actually produces — the difference is chemistry. Every unit below really played together at 5-on-5; nothing is hypothetical.

How to read this

Nothing here is invented: every line and pair below actually played together at 5-on-5, with real minutes attached. For each unit we show its observed — the slice of scoring chances it controlled while on the ice, where 50% means break-even.

The interesting part is the split. We first compute an : what those players should produce together if a line were just the sum of its parts. Whatever the real unit does beyond that is the — the closest a spreadsheet gets to measuring whether three players actually fit. Small-minute units are noisy, so read a big bonus on 30 minutes as a hypothesis, not a verdict — and remember this is a model estimate, not the coach's lineup card.

BASE
what the unit “should” produce — its members' individual profiles, added up
CHEM
observed share minus base: the whole vs. the sum of the parts
PROJ
base + chem — the model's expectation if the unit stays together
TICK
the hairline on each bar marks 50% — the break-even line
Fine print · verbatim from the model
  • Lines recovered from MoneyPuck lines.csv (5on5, observed deployment); chemistry = observed xG% minus additive archetype base. Model-estimated.
CHIChicago Blackhawks66 units observed · 5v5As of Sun, Sep 20
Forward lines
2 units
  • 01
    Tyler Bertuzzi – Frank Nazar – Oliver Moore
    Together this unit controls play outright — 59% of expected goals, 14 points better than these players' profiles predict. Real chemistry.
    65 min together 45 +14 → proj 59
    59.0%
    · obs.
  • 02
    Andre Burakovsky – Ryan Greene – Connor Bedard
    Together this unit gets buried territorially — 42% of expected goals, 4 points better than these players' profiles predict. Real chemistry.
    354 min together 39 +4 → proj 42
    42.0%
    · obs.
Defense pairs
3 units
  • 01
    Matt Grzelcyk – Louis Crevier
    Together this unit controls play outright — 59% of expected goals, 36 points better than these players' profiles predict. Real chemistry.
    92 min together 23 +36 → proj 59
    59.0%
    · obs.
  • 02
    Wyatt Kaiser – Sam Rinzel
    Together this unit spends the night chasing — 45% of expected goals, 21 points better than these players' profiles predict. Real chemistry.
    375 min together 24 +21 → proj 45
    45.0%
    · obs.
  • 03
    Alex Vlasic – Artyom Levshunov
    Together this unit gets buried territorially — 33% of expected goals, 13 points better than these players' profiles predict. Real chemistry.
    215 min together 20 +13 → proj 33
    33.0%
    · obs.
◆ The ModelObserved 5v5 deployment · MoneyPuck linesModel-estimated proxy, not a lineup card

Lines recovered from MoneyPuck lines.csv (5on5, observed deployment); chemistry = observed xG% minus additive archetype base. Model-estimated.